Triple Word Score Watch Movie Without Registering youtube Streaming

Rated 7.7/10 based on 598 customer reviews

↡↡↡↡↡↡↡↡↡↡↡↡

DOWNLOAD ^ WATCH

⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰

 

 

Reviews - A detective fantasy / family drama where a love of words helps a father reconnect with a missing son. Countries - UK. tomatometers - 6,7 / 10. Release Year - 2018. Writed by - Frank Cottrell Boyce. Bazen daima asla watch movies. Listeners 156 Scrobbles 5, 659 Triple Word Score was formed in 2000 in Vancouver, Canada by Bassist / Vocalist Jamaal Francis, Guitarist / Vocalist Brent King & Drummer Chris Landry. After their debut 5 song e. p. gained popularity on local University radio. TWS started playing for bigger crowds by opening for more etablished acts like Fat Wreck Chords band The Real McKenzies. Soon TWS caught the attention of the legendary punk label Long Beach Records / made popular by early releases by Sublime, LB Dub Allstars and Secret Hate. On Nov 2, 2001 the album "The First in a Long Line of Disasters wa… read more Triple Word Score was formed in 2000 in Vancouver, Canada by Bassist / Vocalist Jamaal Francis, Guitarist / Vocalist Brent King & Drummer Chris Landry. TWS started playing for bigger crowds by opening for more eta… read more Triple Word Score was formed in 2000 in Vancouver, Canada by Bassist / Vocalist Jamaal Francis, Guitarist / Vocalist Brent King & Drummer Chris Landry. Soon TWS cau… read more.

Bazen daima asla watch movie free. Bazen daima asla watch movie full. Bazen daima asla watch movie theater. Bazen daima asla watch movie streaming. Bazen daima asla watch movie watch. Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie page. Bazen daima asla watch movie 2. I get that it's a low budget film and idiosyncrasies that come with it, but this movie was complete. rubbish. A terrible clash of croc dundee, Indiana Jones and fast and the furious with 4x4s. I'd been hanging out for months to see it and went in expecting nothing and still left disappointed. Buzz's back story and the ranger was completely pointless, should have stuck to the one story line rather than try to explain each character and background. The over the top aussie and vegan activists talking scenes are cringe and awful. Sorry, I really wanted to like it, but I just couldn't. See More I loved this movie - it was such great fun. And this is coming from someone who, I'll be honest, wou. ld so NOT have picked myself as the 4WD movie loving type. Rollicking good fun, wonderful production values, great performances, and some very cool action sequences. Stunning scenery, great score. I could go on. Basically - I see a lot of stuff, and this felt like an irreverent breath of fresh air compared to many of the movies currently coming out. A fun, popcorn movie in the best sense of the word - an entertaining Aussie adventure movie that in some areas is more than a little reminiscent of Indiana Jones. Well done to all involved. See More Kept looking for it at our local (rural) it wasn't good enough to screen because it. wasn't some brain wash the masses big budget yankie dribble! Finally got to watch it, and LOVED of larrikinism (is that a word. not a heap of 'in ya face' violence - not full of swearing and sex (so even the kid's can watch it. great scenery - a good story line without being complicated - and sticking it to the fruit cakes and corporation together: For those sooking about things like different vehicles used, not stimulating for the intellectuals and other trivial rubbish, it's a for entertainment, not to replicate real life; If I could've given it a 10/10. I would've. Looking forward to any possible future work: See More.

Bazen daima asla watch movie list

Bazen daima asla watch movie youtube

Sometimes Always Never The movie Sometimes Always Never (aka Triple Word Score) trailer, clips, photos, soundtrack, news and much more! You may watch below the first official trailer of Sometimes Always Never, the upcoming drama comedy movie directed by Carl Hunter and starring Bill Nighy, Jenny Agutter, Sam Riley, Alice Lowe, and Tim McInnerny: SOMETIMES ALWAYS NEVER Plot synopsis: “Bill Nighy stars as Alan, a stylish tailor with moves as sharp as his suits. He has spent years searching tirelessly for his missing son Michael who stormed out over a game of Scrabble. With a body to identify and his family torn apart, Alan must repair the relationship with his youngest son Peter (Sam Riley) and solve the mystery of an online player who he thinks could be Michael, so he can finally move on and reunite his family. ” Are you in for a spellbinding Scrabble drama movie with Bill Nighy? No official US release date yet, but the film will hit UK theaters on February 22, 2019. Tags: Sometimes Always Never Take a look tot his new poster of Sometimes Always Never (previously titled Triple Word Score) the upcoming drama comedy movie starring Bill Nighy: Click on the poster to enlarge. SOMETIMES ALWAYS NEVER Family is a four letter word. Plot synopsis: “Bill Nighy stars as Alan, a stylish tailor with moves as sharp as his suits. ” He kind of reminds me of Mary Poppins with that umbrella, lol. The film is directed by Carl Hunter. No official release date. Tags: Sometimes Always Never A first official look at Sometimes Always Never (previously titled Triple Word Score) the upcoming drama comedy movie directed by Carl Hunter and starring Bill Nighy, Jenny Agutter, Sam Riley, Alice Lowe, and Tim McInnerny: Click on a picture to enlarge. Plot synopsis: “Alan (Bill Nighy) is a man in his sixties, like everyone his life has been touched by a bit of tragedy (one of his sons went missing in his late teens) and disappointment (he has a very distant relationship with his other son and his grandson. Unlike most people however Alan believes that all this can be put right. Monstrously insensitive, Alan barges into his adult sons home and life, trying to make everyone have more fun, while at the same time being utterly oblivious to hurt and chaos he causes. He coerces his grandson into playing scrabble for money. He gets a new girlfriend. He becomes obsessed with the idea that his missing son can be found and is communicating to him through online word games. The odd thing is that – although he is a monster, the people around him really are becoming happier, and more self confident. But can Alan make himself happier too? Can he find his missing son? Sometimes Always Never is intriguing, odd, warm and funny and so much more than a play on words. ” Communicating to him through online games? So hes got a tendency to perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things? Well, theres a name for this: its called apophenia. Dont forget this word it may come handy next time you play Scrabble! No official release date yet. Tags: Sometimes Always Never A teaser poster for Triple Word Score, the upcoming drama comedy movie directed by Carl Hunter and starring Bill Nighy: Click on the poster to enlarge. TRIPLE WORD SCORE Plot synopsis: “Golden Globe Award winning actor Bill Nighy stars as Alan, a tailor who closes up shop to move in with his surly son Peter and grandson Jack. There is distance between Alan and Peter as he blames his father for the disappearance of his brother Michael. Meanwhile, Alan and Jack begin to bond over their favourite game, Scrabble. Conflict builds to a tipping point when Alan is convinced that an online Scrabble opponent could actually be his missing son and decides to try and meet the player in person. TRIPLE WORD SCORE is emotional multi-generational tale of family, of love, of loss and of finding just the right words. ” Any fan of scrabble out there? Are you impatient to see the film? The film has yet to get an official release date. Stay tuned with us for more details about the movie Triple Word Score. Update – A photo of the first film slate: Click on the picture to enlarge. Tags: Sometimes Always Never Sometimes Always Never Genre: Drama/Comedy Directed by: Carl Hunter Starring: Bill Nighy Release Date: TBA 2018 More Information at: Sometimes Always Never Trailer Tags: Bill Nighy, Carl Hunter, Comedy, Drama, Sometimes Always Never, TBA 2018.

Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie.

Bazen daima asla watch movie download

Bazen daima asla watch movie 2016. Bazen Daima Asla Watch movies. Bazen Daima Asla Watch. Bazen daima asla watch movie online. Bazen daima asla watch movie trailer. Bazen daima asla watch movie hindi. 80 Best TV series and movies images in 2020, Tv series, Movies, About time movie. Triple Word Score movie is currently in Pre-Production March 6, 2017 • Key talent and film crew being hired; budgeting, preparing and planning of production schedule; approving final shooting script. Who's Involved: Bill Nighy, Carl Hunter Rating: N/A Runtime: N/A Triple Word Score Plot: What's the story? Bill Nighy stars as Alan, a tailor who closes up shop to move in with his surly son Peter and grandson Jack. There is distance between Alan and Peter as he blames his father for the disappearance of his brother Michael. Meanwhile, Alan and Jack begin to bond over their favourite game, Scrabble. Conflict builds to a tipping point when Alan is convinced that an online Scrabble opponent could actually be his missing son and decides to try and meet the player in person. T official plot version from Poll: Will you see Triple Word Score? Triple Word Score Cast: Who are the actors? Bill Nighy   Emma, Hope Gap Crew and Production Credits: Who's making Triple Word Score? A look at the Triple Word Score behind-the-scenes crew and production team. The film's director Carl Hunter last directed Sometimes Always Never. Production Companies Triple Word Score Trailers & Videos Production Timeline: When did the Triple Word Score come together? On or about March 6, 2017 • The film was in Pre-Production status. Triple Word Score Release Date: When is it coming out? Triple Word Score is coming out To Be Announced (TBA. United States TBA Canada TBA Questions: Frequently Asked About Triple Word Score Looking for more information on Triple Word Score Check out the below links, may contain affiliate links. Across the Web More Info on IMDb.

Bazen daima asla watch movie cast. Bazen daima asla watch movies 2017. Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie database. Something went wrong, but dont fret — lets give it another shot. Bazen daima asla watch movie english. Bazen daima asla watch movie 2018. Its fitting that LeBron James is taking the Space Jam reins from Michael Jordan, since last week James passed Jordan in career points scored and the two have always been compared since James was in high school.  Jordan would have scored many more points if only he hadnt taken two years off in his prime to try his hand at baseball.  Rumour has always held that Jordan went to play baseball in order to avoid a gambling suspension, mainly because it made no sense at all for the notoriously competitive Jordan to have “retired” at age 30 (Jordan would retire twice more before his basketball career was over. Jordans baseball career features prominently in Space Jams loose plot, as if he had been playing basketball at the time, the evil aliens from the Moron Mountain amusement park would have taken Jordans skills and he never would have been able to help the Looney Tunes gang.  But because Jordan was retired, the aliens had to steal other NBA players talent, including Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing, Larry Johnson, Muggsy Bogues and Shawn Bradley.  Jordan is then recruited by Bugs Bunny to play with a bunch of other cartoon characters, with some help from Bill Murray and no help at all from Wayne Knight, as the cartoons take on the aliens in a basketball game to determine whether the aliens will enslave those loony ‘toons as an amusement park attraction. This movie was probably never any good but it has been made worse with age.  The animation is dated, the green screen work is horrible, and worst of all, the “stars” involved in this movie, other than the great Charles Barkley, have been forgotten by all but the most attentive New York Knicks fans (who would punch me in the face for saying anything bad about Ewing and who will never forget LJ hitting a clutch four-point play against the Pacers in 1999s Eastern Conference Finals.   Space Jam also really highlights how much the Looney Tunes feel like variations of one another (cat/duck and man/pig in particular) and pale imitations of their Disney counterparts. Even with only a 90 minute run-time, a significant part of the movie feels like filler, including an opening scene with a 1- year old Jordan, about 5 minutes of Jordan highlights during the opening credits, and a subplot of sorts that features some really terrible acting by the three kids playing Jordans family (like so bad that you figure they have to be Jordans real kids, but theyre totally not – I checked. If LeBrons career arc is any indication, the next Space Jam is destined to be technically superior to Jordans original but lacking the same emotional core.  That doesnt bode well for the reboot when there was no substance or emotion to the first Space Jam at all.  Watching it again only makes one wonder why anyone bothered to make it in the first place, as well as why James would want to invite any more comparisons to Jordans six for six NBA Finals record against LeBrons three wins and six losses in his attempts (which I dont begrudge but Im in the minority on that point.   On the other hand, since the original Space Jam has nothing to offer, the reboot cant possibly be worse! If anyone was going to love Uncle Drew, it would have been me. After all, in the early 90s my bedroom walls were covered with posters of Shaquille ONeal and Reggie Miller, among others (Michael Jordans posters covered the most real estate, of course. Also in the early 90s, I watched Chris Webber call a timeout he didnt have (after travelling first) and cost his team a championship (which would have been lost either way since that team has been erased from the NCAA record books. Many years later, I got to watch Kyrie Irving take on Russell Westbrook live in Oklahoma City, as Kyrie made everyone besides Russ look like they were standing still. And like most basketball fans, I never sought out Nate Robertson or had any of his posters, though I am sure I saw him win a few dunk contests (somehow he won more of those than Jordan. Kyrie Irving plays Uncle Drew, an old guy whos still got game, and who gets recruited onto a streetball team by Get Outs Lil Rey Howery in order to beat a team coached by Howerys childhood nemesis, Nick Kroll. Uncle Drew has one condition: Howery has to help reunite Uncle Drews old team. Reluctant but out of options, Howery agrees and heads out on a road trip to search for a bunch of old guys made up to look slightly older (the three all-time greats I mentioned above, along with Robinson. From L to R: Shaquille ONeal, Chris Webber, Nate Robinson, Reggie Miller and Kyrie Irving on the set of UNCLE DREW. Photo courtesy of Lionsgate. Seeing Shaq, Reggie, and C-Webb team up with one of the most exciting players in todays NBA should have been enough for me to somewhat enjoy this movie (with superdunker Aaron Gordon and WNBA/Team U. S. A. legend Lisa Leslie as added bonuses. But it wasnt. The basketball scenes really werent exceptional, and with such a skilled roster, they should have been. They NEEDED to be, because as hard as Howery, Kroll and Tiffany Haddish try, the attempts at comedy in this movie fall flat. So all thats left is the basketball, which is not even Blue Chips quality (at least Blue Chips features prime Shaq instead of Uncle Drews heart attack Shaq. The Uncle Drew concept made for an entertaining Pepsi ad because Kyrie Irving made highlight-reel plays wearing several coats of old man makeup. Not surprisingly, that concept wears very, very thin when stretched to feature length. The old man gimmick and a bit of nostalgia are really all that Uncle Drew (the movie) has to offer, so its simply not strong enough for me to recommend, as much as I wish I could. Like any good sports movie, The Rebound has an impressive training montage. The men push themselves to be stronger, go longer, play harder. They are fast, they are dedicated. They get up at ungodly hours to work out, and their grocery bills reflect their need to ‘feed the machine. But the stars of The Rebound arent your usual athletes. In basketball, a rebound is when a player regains control of the ball after a shot is missed. Its the second chance play. In the NWBA, the players contend with a different kind of rebound. Its how a man picks himself up after a life-altering accident has left them paralyzed. The W stands for wheelchair. This documentary follows a few key players on the Miami Heat Wheels as they push toward a national championship. But for the Wheels, it can never be as simple as playing well. Funding, for them, will always be an issue. The county gave them 2500 for the season when a trip to nationals alone will cost 11 grand. So between playing, traveling, and training, theyll also be fund-raising. Some of these men will discuss their accidents, and since many are a result of GSWs, they discuss, by extension, the need for gun control. Some of them are hoping to earn athletic scholarships for school. One is trying to break into the music industry. But theyre all really passionate about basketball, which is good, because when youre strapped into a chair and careening at high-speeds on a court, the game looks brutal and dangerous. But they make it look easy. Physical, yes, but sometimes also surprisingly elegant. Like lots of movies about sports, this documentary is about triumph over obstacles – its just that these athletes encounter challenges both on and off the courts. Ronnie Coleman ripped the bodybuilding world in two in 1999 when he appeared on the already crowded scene. A former cop and powerlifter, he ties the record for most Mr. Olympia wins with 8, count em – 8, victories. Thats how you get a nickname like The King. But since his retirement, hes been plagued with injury as a result. Hes had numerous back surgeries, and both hips replaced. He needs crutches just to walk. The documentary catches up with him on the eve of his 8th (count em – 8) surgery, and hes crippled with pain. Its awful to watch him walk. His accomplishments are enormous (bodybuilding pun. and veiny, but told through the prism of his disability, theyre not exactly dimmed, but the context is clearly costly. Too costly, some, in fact most, would say. But as Ronnie pulls up to the supplement store, he parks in the handicap accessibility parking – and even then he barely makes it in. But what is he even doing there? Well, despite the fact that hes popping the max dosage in pain pills, Ronnie is still drinking his protein shakes because Ronnie is still training. Its killing him, but he cant stop. Its really interesting to watch someone attain the absolute top in his field, and its interesting in a different, guilt-laced way to watch him fall. But Ronnie Coleman with a broken body proves there are different kinds of strength. Its a mental fortitude hell need to cope with his loss. His smile and positive attitude go a long way. This documentary has everything – the highs and lows, tragedy and comedy. Well, this documentary has almost everything. You dont achieve 300lbs of lean muscle, go down in history as the greatest bodybuilder of all time, without a little help. But director Vlad Yudin does not so much as whisper the word steroids. So no, there is not complete transparency here, perhaps an effort not to tarnish the kings image. The picture is incomplete but on the whole its still an enjoyable, heartbreaking, uplifting (bodybuilder pun. watch. Janae Marie Kroczaleski was just going about her business in 2015 when she was publicly outed by a Youtuber without her consent. Her parents disowned her, her sponsors dropped her: overnight her life had been decided for her. Born Matt Kroczaleski, she had known for a long time that her true identity was female. Matt joined the Marines to help “push down the feminine stuff. ” He married and had 3 children. But Matt never felt right in his skin. If he had to live as a male, he had to be the biggest, strongest guy he could be, and he was. A power-lifter known to his fans simply as ‘Kroc, Matt became the strongest man in the world for his size. Still, he thought constantly about living as a woman, and didnt feel authentic in his body. Over a period of 10 years, he began transitioning many times. He didnt quit because it was difficult, or because he was unsure. Hed quit because he couldnt reconcile the two halves of himself: the need to be strong AND be a woman. In his male skin, he needed to be the biggest, the most muscular, but as a woman he wanted to be petite. When he cut weight, dieted and stopped lifting, he deprived himself of his friends, his support system, the world he knew and the lifestyle he loved. Muscles were a security blanket of sorts. Its hard to let those go. Director Michael Del Monte makes a fascinating documentary because hes chosen a subject who is open and accessible. Janae is courageous and enlightening. It may not have been her idea to go public, but she embraces it bravely. I loved her willingness to speak candidly about failed transitions. I adored scenes with her family – her sons are terrific people who are not only supportive but engaged in her transition, asking intelligent questions while treating her in the same loving way theyve always treated their father – they know this is the same person, only happier and more honest. These young men have a lot to teach adults twice their age. The documentary bracingly follows Janae as she makes this transition her last. Shes going to learn that all women are strong, by necessity, no matter what they look like on the outside. Matt Kroczaleski went through a lot in his life, but Janae understands that her path will be hardest to follow. In this documentary, she loses her job, encounters protesters, has “elective” surgery that for her is life-saving, life- embracing, is a supportive and knowledgeable judge at transfitcon, and evaluates her ass in a pair of skinny jeans. The world is complex. Janae is realistic. Transformer doesnt speak for all transgendered people, but it speaks wonderfully to one womans experience. Its personal, its intimate, and its a beautiful portrait of a life in transition and a woman coming in to her own. Monique is not your average high school student. She acts tough and gets into a lot of fights. But its easy to judge someone when we dont know anything about them. Id say her home life isnt good, but Monique doesnt have a home. She has had a series of foster situations since her mother died that all end badly. Her fathers in prison, and she cant help but daydream about the day he gets out and she can live with him and have some sort of regular life again. Until she runs into him on the street. The daydreams come to a crashing halt right about then. Hes out and hasnt told her, hasnt contacted her, and now that she knows – well, hes not really amenable to her vision of their shared future (to be fair, hes eating at soup kitchens and engaging in at least semi-criminal behaviour, so hes not exactly capable of providing a “stable home life. ”) Anyway, poor Mo decides the only way she attract her dads attention, and maybe neutralize some of her schools ire, is to join the wrestling team. There is no girls team so she joins the boys team, despite the protestations of nearly all of the boys. First Match distinguishes itself from other similarly-themed sports movies because the team is not really Mos problem. If a little adversity from the boys were Mos only problem, shes probably feel blessed. Instead, Monique excels at the sport and it becomes a source of pride and power for her. Even if doesnt win her father back, its earning her some self-respect, which she needs and deserves. Monique is obviously supposed to be some problem child, but its impossible not to sympathize with her. There are no easy fixes, and the script is bold enough not to offer any. Life is stacked against this kid, and even if the viewer is the only one rooting for her, at least theres that. Id like to give her a hug if I wasnt totally positive shed roll her eyes at me for even trying. This movie is grounded in realism that bites. The team becomes her de-facto family, but First Match still retains a sense that Monique is, if not lucky, at least relatively unique in her community because she knows her father and has him in her life. Its tragic and depressing the lengths shell go to in order to keep him there; shes got daddy issues, but at least shes got a daddy. The premise seems to imply that this will be a movie about a lone girl in a male-dominated sport, but this turns out be an afterthought. But theres a lot else to contemplate, and Elvire Emanuelles performance is not to be missed. Coming soon to a Netflix near you. Margot Robbie is convinced this film will change your mind about Tonya Harding. Is she a villain or a victim? Abused or abuser? The truth is, your opinion doesnt really matter and truth doesnt really exist. What does exist: a wholly funny film that never fails to entertain. {In the unlikely event youre in need of a refresher: Tonya Harding was an American figure skater in the 1990s, and competed twice in the Olympics. She was known for two things: for being the first American female to land a triple axel in competition, and for bashing in her Nancy Kerrigans knee. } Margot Robbie is well-cast as Tonya Harding. Shes still just a little too pretty to play white trash, even with the poofy 90s bangs, but she comes down low and its pretty glorious. Sebastian Stan plays Hardings good for nothing husband, Jeff Gillooly, and he disappears into the role of dumb fuck. Jeffs dumb ass best friend Shawn (Paul Walter Hauser) pretends to be an international spy even though hes a grownup who lives with his parents. Not exactly criminal masterminds, but this is the trio that brought us the most delicious scandal of 1994 (until OJ Simpson that is – if you thought Lillehammer was competitive, try being a celebrity fuck up. But for my money, Id have to say that the real cast stand-out was Ms. Allison Janney, who plays Tonyas mother LaVonam who, by sheer comparison, makes bathtub scum look appealing. Shes the dirtiest of dirts with not a kind word or intention in the world. If being a crummy mother was an Olympic sport, she wouldnt have to resort to breaking any kneecaps. The first thing that may surprise you about this film is that its funny. Actually funny, though pretty dark – the kind of laughs you feel slightly guilty about succumbing to, but youll need to just embrace the absurdity. It is  farcical, in the way only a true story can be when its populated with idiots. The second thing that surprised me anyway, was that it actually does dredge up sympathy for our poor Tonya. Her guilt (or innocence) is not really the point. This is Tonyas story, hers alone from beginning to end. No ones trying to excuse what happened, but putting “the incident” within context is actually very interesting. I, Tonya is funny, dramatic, pumped full of energy, and even the sports angle is well-done. Certainly Margot Robbie can be commended for all the hard work she put in getting skate-ready, but she gets a lot of help from choreographers, stunt people, and CGI – effects that are pulled off almost seemlessly. But its the camera work that makes the figure skating extra exciting – you really get a sense of the speed and athleticism, two hallmarks of Hardings style in particular. No matter your experience of “the incident” at the time, I, Tonya turns tragedy into triumph. Post navigation.

Critics Consensus Like the grieving Scrabble enthusiast at the heart of its unique story, Sometimes Always Never scores high enough to be well worth a play. 87% TOMATOMETER Total Count: 47 Coming soon Release date: Mar 6, 2020 Audience Score Ratings: Not yet available Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) Ratings & Reviews Explanation Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) Videos Photos Movie Info Alan is a stylish tailor with moves as sharp as his suits. He has spent years searching tirelessly for his missing son Michael who stormed out over a game of Scrabble. With a body to identify and his family torn apart, Alan must repair the relationship with his youngest son Peter and solve the mystery of an online player who he thinks could be Michael, so he can finally move on and reunite his family. Rating: PG-13 (for thematic elements and some sexual references) Genre: Directed By: Written By: In Theaters: Mar 6, 2020 limited Runtime: 91 minutes Studio: Blue Fox Entertainment Cast Critic Reviews for Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) Audience Reviews for Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) There are no featured reviews for Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) because the movie has not released yet (Mar 6, 2020. See Movies in Theaters Sometimes Always Never (Triple Word Score) Quotes News & Features.

Bazen daima asla watch movie hd. Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie maker. Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie reviews. I try to keep my ratings as objective as possible. However, the film's placements on the list is strictly subjective. R, 161 min Comedy, Drama 83 Metascore A faded television actor and his stunt double strive to achieve fame and success in the film industry during the final years of Hollywood's Golden Age in 1969 Los Angeles. Director: Quentin Tarantino Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, Margot Robbie, Emile Hirsch Votes: 379, 182, Gross: 135. 37M After I initially watched this movie I was trying like crazy to write a review of it, but I just couldn't do it. It blew my mind wide open and I was struggling so hard to collect the pieces that I scrapped it. I've seen it twice now and can hopefully come up with a more cohesive review. This movie is so well crafted. The world-building in this movie is nothing short of phenomenal. Everything feels so lived in, real, genuine, from the city buildings to cars, clothes, homes, interior sets. They went so far to perfecting every little detail in this universe that you can't help but smile. And they show off this fact shamelessly and for good reasons. There are scenes where people are just driving through the city - listening to music, minding their business and all I can do is sit back, relax and enjoy the view. I love the way the movie is structured. There's no clear narrative, no clear path from point A to point B, things just happen and I love when movies are like that. It's my favorite sub-sub-genre. Sure, there is a story of a washed up actor trying to cope with his downfall, but in the middle of the film we're basically just watching a bunch of vignettes one after the other. Which is why I think I was so baffled after first seeing it, I was not expecting something like this from Tarantino. He's spent decades of making story-heavy movies with excellent dialogue. Now all of the sudden he drops a movie with almost no story and not even close to the kind of Tarantino-style dialogue we've gotten used to. This movie is closer to Under the Silver Lake than it is to Pulp Fiction. However, there still are a bunch of Tarantino moments. The scene at the ranch is essential Tarantino tension, the occasional voice-over, all the cameos and, of course, the ending. So all of his hardcore fans will very much enjoy this, guaranteed. There are still some things that I don't quite get. There's a short clip of Leo singing about a green door, which is way too specific to not mean anything. There's a bit about Brad Pitt's wife that is mentioned once and is never referenced again. I have an idea of its significance, but still not sure. Why did Steve McQueen show up and give us some exposition? Nevertheless, these are just trivial things in comparison to the big picture. I love this movie. It's up there amongst my favorite Tarantino movies. A perfect score sounds like a bit too much, but not far off. I may bump it up to a 10 in the future but I'll settle myself for now. 9/10 I did it. 10/10 159 min Action, Crime, Drama 60 Once two overzealous cops get suspended from the force, they must delve into the criminal underworld to get their proper compensation. S. Craig Zahler Mel Gibson, Vince Vaughn, Tory Kittles, Michael Jai White 28, 147 This was kind of great. It's so refreshing to see a movie as unfiltered as this one. There's no holding back during the action scenes, you see things in gory detail and completely matter of fact. Every emotion conveyed is done so without any help of filmmaking manipulation. There is absolutely no score in this movie. There are some songs, but they all seem to fit narratively and aren't just S. Craig Zahler's Spotify playlist. The action scenes are very subdued and mature. Every shot is static and there's no score underlying them. It's the perfect way to handle action scenes. It's similar to the movie Haywire, which is one of my favorites. They do something that I absolutely love in this movie which is giving alot backstory and character to all the minor characters. The henchmen don't just show up, we see them doing their own stuff before they get thrown into the main plot. The bank teller has a long and emotional scene before she is thrown into the action. More movies should do this, especially in this genre. It actually provides you with a reason to care about them instead of them just being blank slates. The movie had a great way of pacing and sequencing its scenes. It made the movie fly by like it was only 90 minutes long. It also helps that it's expertly shot and lit. Why I'm not giving this a perfect score: It uses some of the same sound effects too close to each other. I don't exactly buy that they weren't noticed until they reached the financial district. Both Mel Gibson and Vince Vaughn are given certain phrases that they keep using throughout the film and it started to wear on me the further it went. Some of the indoor shots, especially in the early stages of the film, are a bit too over-exposed. Jennifer Carpenter has a scene when she's to deliver heartbreaking acting but I didn't think that she did just that. I think it would've worked better with another actor. Everyone else's acting was pretty much on point though. Mel Gibson especially, he did a great job. Watch this movie if you haven't. It's a real gem. 8/10 135 min Crime, Drama, Thriller 90 A charismatic New York City jeweler always on the lookout for the next big score makes a series of high-stakes bets that could lead to the windfall of a lifetime. Howard must perform a precarious high-wire act, balancing business, family, and encroaching adversaries on all sides in his relentless pursuit of the ultimate win. Directors: Benny Safdie, Josh Safdie Mesfin Lamengo, Sun Zhi Hua-Hilton, Liang Wei-Hui-Duncan, Sunny Wu Jin Zahao 87, 539 If you've seen Good Time you know what you're getting yourself into. These guys have something special. They could make an 8 hour movie about a bill passing and it would be the most exciting thing ever. It's like they tailor their movies specifically for me. Their insane energy combined with their exuberant style and enigmatic score just puts me in a trance, basically for the entire runtime. They have great casting choices as well. Hat's off to Adam Sandler for this role. I know he can be great, which is why it's such a shame that he keeps doing his sh*tty comedies. Whenever he does a movie like this, he's awesome. Julia Fox is also fantastic. In Good Time they hired the rapper Necro to play a small but important character and he did it well. In this movie they hire The Weeknd to do the same thing, but they also hired Kevin Garnett and he's amazing. He does play himself, but he sells every moment. Growing up he was one of my favorite NBA-players so it was really fun for him to work as well as he does in this movie. Not only that, but the actual eastern conference semi-finals from 2012 between Boston and Philadelphia plays a huge part in this movie. We see actual footage from the games in this movie, all in its official broadcasting. I heard both Kenny Smith's and Chris Webber's voices - that is f'king commitment. Although, Sandler refers to the braodcasting as ESPN, when it's actually TNT. So the movie sucks. What else can I tell you? I don't want to give any details about the sequence of events. The movie is just as big of a rush as Good Time. I'm not sure which I like more yet, but that will be determined in time. Flaws? Adam Sandler's fake teeth were a bit distracting. It looked as if the character was wearing fake teeth in context of the film. The score was fantastic, but wasn't utilized as much as in Good Time. I would've loved to hear more of it. That's pretty much it, though. It's a phenomenal piece of filmmaking and I hope they make a 100 more of these. I would call their style outlandish in the greatest ways possible. 9/10 104 min Comedy, Fantasy, Horror 53 The peaceful town of Centerville finds itself battling a zombie horde as the dead start rising from their graves. Jim Jarmusch Bill Murray, Adam Driver, Tom Waits, Chloë Sevigny 36, 531 6. 56M It's basically everything I expected and wanted out of it. I'm not sure why Jim Jarmusch hasn't done this before. His style is perfect for a zombie movie and the cast he assembled was so much fun. I love huge star-studdered casts with familiar names in all the small roles as well as the leads. It was very fun seeing RZA in it, especially after the Wu-Tang series. I loved that Larry Fessenden had as much screentime as he did in a movie this big. Everyone was a blast to watch. I loved the character dynamics. Chloe Sevigny was clearly in love with Adam Driver and he just did not give a f'k which was hilarious. There were a couple of characters who's death happened off-screen which was interesting. In a zombie movie where the deaths are always graphically shown it really came as a surprise when this happened. There was a guy in this movie, he was a juvie guard, that looked and acted acted exactly like Bruce Willis. Which makes me think that they wanted Bruce Willis for that role but couldn't get him. There was a meta element to this movie that I also found really funny. I really liked the score, it was similar to the score of Dead Man. There are some loose ends, mainly one, that I would've liked to see be resolved, but it's the most Jim Jarmusch thing to do that I'm not exactly surprised. The CGI work was kind of bad. So, the movie is not perfect. If you go into this movie not knowing about Jarmusch's work, like I imagine alot of people did, I can fully understand if the movie felt like a jarring experience. The dialogue is repetitive as well. I think that fans of the zombie genre might hate this, because the movie sporadically acts as if it's the first zombie movie ever made. I didn't care, though. I just loved it. 152 min Drama, Fantasy, Horror 59 Years following the events of "The Shining. a now-adult Dan Torrance must protect a young girl with similar powers from a cult known as The True Knot, who prey on children with powers to remain immortal. Mike Flanagan Ewan McGregor, Rebecca Ferguson, Kyliegh Curran, Cliff Curtis 69, 774 I really liked it. Mike Flanagan has a great style to his direction. This wasn't as scary as his other projects, but it still had his way of creating atmosphere all over the place. The movie is very ambitious, almost more so than The Haunting of Hill House. I have to give props to how meticulously they re-created the original sets from The Shining. Although, at the same time, that part was the one moment in the movie when they were going "REMEMBER THIS. Especially when he goes in to wake up the hotel. It went on a little bit too long. Most of the references were handled well, but that was pushing it too far. I loved the score, though. It's all recycled ambience from The Shining, but it still sounds like its own thing. The acting is fine, it's not the film's strongest aspect. While no one does a bad job, no one is giving an Oscar performance except for maybe Carel Struycken who was pretty great. Possibly the best acting that I've seen from him. I do like the ending. I don't know if it follows the end of the book that this is based on. If so then Stephen King ended the book in the exact same way as he ended The Shining. Regardless, I liked that this movie, which is a sequel to the movie that's vastly different from the book, ended in that way. The movie is good. You should watch it. 209 min Biography, Crime, Drama 94 A mob hitman recalls his friend Jimmy Hoffa. Martin Scorsese Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, Joe Pesci, Harvey Keitel 238, 030 Somehow, while being 3, 5 hours long and involving this huge cast of legends, this felt really quaint to me. It's the movie equivelant of a band reunion. Scorsese gets the old gang together to do one last gig. I love him as a director, I don't think there's anyone who doesn't, but after seeing The Irishman I kind of wish that this was his last film. It really feels like his goodbye to the industry, but he still has upcoming projects. I want him to keep making movies, it's just that this was the perfect send-off. This was his Fanny and Alexander. I guess I should get into the actual movie. It's classic Scorsese - the rise and fall of this one guy and we get to meet all the crazy characters that he encounters on the journey. The obvious parallel is Goodfellas. However, he's older now and doesn't attatch the incredibly vibrant tone of that onto this movie. The characters are much older than in Goodfellas and so it makes sense for him to ditch that young man's exuberance for this movie. The camera work is still fun and it moves around alot. It's not just this flat and boring cinematography, just a bit more restrained in comparison to Mean Streets or something. He also structures his films in the best possible ways. The pace is never dull. It doesn't matter how long his films are, they always fly by. Thanks to the way he has the characters interracting with each other combined with the tight script and editing you're bound to be interested all the way through. The use of music is also well handled. He knows when to play a song and when to rely completely on silence. The latter is something he works with particularly well in this movie. Let's talk about this ensemble. Wow. Robert De Niro gives his best performance in years. The things that he can do with silence is outstanding. He can carry a scene through thick and thin just by the power of his expressions and he utilises this ability to the fullest here. Also, that phone call scene towards the end - I reallt felt that. They completeley sold that moment. Al Pacino also gives his best performance in probably over 20 years. He's the polar opposite and it totally works. It creates this great character dynamic between him and De Niro. He definitely supplies with the funniest scenes, especially in his scenes with Stephen Graham who, by the way, looks alot like Kevin Spacey in this movie. Joe Pesci does a comeback and gives his most quiet performance to date. He's really great as well. I would love for all these guys to get some award nods. I will be seeing this again. As of this moment I'm not completely sure where to place it on the list. Martin Scorsese is a master at what he does and this just might be one of my favorites from him. A second viewing will determine if I like it more or less than some other movies from this year, though. TV-MA 90 min Drama, Sport 78 During a pro basketball lockout, a sports agent pitches a rookie basketball client on an intriguing and controversial business proposition. Steven Soderbergh André Holland, Melvin Gregg, Eddie Tavares, Farah Bala 6, 305 Steven Soderbergh is such an efficient filmmaker. He also seems incapable of making an objectively bad movie. Alot of his films, this included, aren't exactly amazing or anything, but they do exactly what they're supposed to do. This is his second film shot on an iphone and the cinematography is phenomenal considering that. I loved the shot composition and the editing combined, which is all done by Soderbergh himself. The story is really neat and well told. The dialogue is great and so fast paced that the movie is over before you know it. The acting is good as well, no one gives an amazing performance or anything, but they're all solid. My only real issue with the film is the interview footage of the basketball players. Reggie Jackson and Donovan Mitchell were fine, they seemed like they were just talking about the game and the industry from their own personal experience. However, Karl-Anthony Towns was just awful. He was obviously reading his lines from above the camera. It looked extremely unnatural and he kept flubbing his lines. The footage also kinda didn't need to be there, the movie would've functioned the same without it. I love basketball, so of course I'm going to love this movie, but even if I didn't, I still love the filmmaking of Steven Soderbergh. He's one of my favourite directors and he barely lets me down ever. This movie was no exception. 7/10 PG Drama, Romance 91 Jo March reflects back and forth on her life, telling the beloved story of the March sisters - four young women each determined to live life on their own terms. Greta Gerwig Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, Florence Pugh, Eliza Scanlen 56, 438 Greta Gerwig pulls it out of the bag once again. I loved this movie. I think I liked it even more than Ladybird. Right off the bat, the script is fantastic. It's written in such a way that the time just flies by. The characters are constantly interrupting each other and still maintaining their conversations, like a family would do. And when the movie gets serious it has quite alot to say, but it doesn't shove it in your face. It builds up to it. All of this is delivered in a whole heap of amazing performances. There isn't a single weak link in this movie. It's one of the best ensemble pieces of the year. Saoirse Ronan is fantastic, she deserved her oscar nomination. I really hope that Florence Pugh wins hers. She stood out as my favorite in this movie. Timotheé Chalamet was also amazing. The chemistry between everyone felt extremely genuine, especially between the sisters. The movie also looks great. It has alot of great shots that'll stick in my head for some time. I loved how the film shifts its color pallett between the past and the present. It's a good indicator, but also purposeful. Kind of like how Memento shifts between black and white and color. Plus, the production and costume design are top notch as well. This is a very easy movie to look at. This is a very easy movie to listen to. The score was beautiful as well. It wasn't overbearing or cheesy in the ways that alot of period pieces can be. It all balanced out perfectly. It's pretty amazing, because I'm generally not fond of period pieces. I can respect them for their craft and give them a great score, but I'll wind up not watching them again for a very long time. I can't wait to watch Little Women again, if only to experience the proposal scene again. I really hope this movie wins something at the Oscars. Give me at least one of the acting and the script. Is the movie perfect? No. There's one plot point that is brushed off very quickly and not really mentioned again. It doesn't really need to be there. No spoilers, it includes a burning and a soaking. Otherwise, it's a much more than adequate follow-up to a strong directorial debut. PG-13 131 min Comedy, Crime, Drama 82 A detective investigates the death of a patriarch of an eccentric, combative family. Rian Johnson Daniel Craig, Chris Evans, Ana de Armas, Jamie Lee Curtis 162, 198 It's a fun, fast paced and engaging murder mystery. It's very fortunate for this movie that I happen to like movies like these - Clue is one of my favorites. It's certainly well made. It has alot of cool, slick-looking panning shots, but the camera is mostly static while still looking really nice. Except for one shot where the camera is very clearly lifted off from the ground and continues in handheld mode. The acting is good. There aren't really any weak links among the cast. I mean, Daniel Craig's character is very cartoony, but he's supposed to be, so you can't really critique his performance in that sense. Unless if you find him annoying, but then again, that's your personal taste which I don't agree with, by the way. Ana De Armas gives the best performance, though. I really liked her in this role. I'm fine with all of the twists and turns. Nothing really bothers me as of my first impressions. Maybe I'll pick up on some inconsistencies or loose ends when I watch it again - and I will be watching it again - but I doubt it, actually. The movie is competent enough on all other fronts for me to vouch for it. I did find myself over-thinking some things, especially in the first act. I suspected that I was going to have to pay strong attention to everything being said in order to keep up with the plot. The movie is clever, but it's not a Charlie Kaufman film. I was able to keep up fine anyway. I kept waiting for one twist to happen and was happy to find out that it never did. It's a cliché that's been done to death in Who-dun-it mysteries, so props to Rian Johnson for not going that route. I liked it because I like murder mysteries. The Agatha Christie crowd will be head over heals for this movie, but it has enough competence in its technical aspects to draw in the film-buffs as well. However, I wouldn't consider this to be something new to the pallet. The experience is not exactly something you wouldn't get out of a Clue or another movie like it. Which is why I'm not giving it an insanely high score, even though I really liked it personally. 109 min Two lighthouse keepers try to maintain their sanity whilst living on a remote and mysterious New England island in the 1890s. Robert Eggers Robert Pattinson, Willem Dafoe, Valeriia Karaman, Logan Hawkes 70, 227 0. 43M Wow. This is one of those where I kind of need a month or two to process everything, connect all the dots. First of all, the language is so period accurate that, even with subtitles, I had a hard time following everything being said in spoken dialogue. And alot of what they're saying at any given point is vital information you need to keep in mind. Whenever these things were re-incorporated I just had this "oh yeah" moment because I vaguely remembered something like that being told before, but I never got the full scope of it. This is not a negative, by the way. The Lighthouse is a movie that requires multiple viewings. I'm just saying that as a person who's first language isn't English - I struggled alot more. What I do know is that this is extremely well made. From the production design to the dialogue to the acting to the cinematography. Lighting, sound design, editing, location shooting - everything is done at a masterful level. I loved how the sound effects are incorporated into the score. It was so menacing and really added to the insanity of the main character. Robert Pattinson brings the character to light extremely well. He sells every moment from beginning to end. However, Willem Dafoe steals the show. His monologue in the latter half is just amazing. It's abysmal that he wasn't nominated for an Oscar. They clearly aren't interested in a movie like this, but they're head over heals about Joker which ironically is a f'king joke. Joker is a good movie, but I mean The Lighthouse. I can see myself placing this higher, but because I need to see it another time or twelve, I'm keeping it here. 9/10 so far. A cop from the provinces moves to Paris to join the Anti-Crime Brigade of Montfermeil, discovering an underworld where the tensions between the different groups mark the rhythm. Ladj Ly Damien Bonnard, Alexis Manenti, Djebril Zonga, Issa Perica 4, 591 This is one of those type of movies where you can call the general beats one by one, you just don't know exactly how, where, when or who, if there's going to be a certain type of message and so on and so forth. It is derivative of other movies like Training Day, La Haine, it vaguely reminded me of another french movie called Polisse I saw a long time ago. However, I think it perfectly stands on its own, builds its own plot, characters and tone extremely well and it's bloody well acted. With this amount of characters it would be easy to lose track of things - á la The Wild Goose Lake - and for there to be alot of loose ends, but they managed to wrap everything up very nicely. You can always tell who's doing what, why they're doing this and so on and so forth. With a cast this big it'd also be easy for there to be quite a few of weak links, especially with these many kids. I know that there is a language barrier because I don't speak french, but I don't think there was a single bad performance in this movie. The little kid who played Issa was phenomenal for a child, honestly. The main cops were all great as well. The movie does something very interesting with these guys. This is a minor spoiler so skip to the next paragraph to avoid it. In generic movies when the filmmakers are trying to make you care for the main character, they introduce you to their families, show that he/she loves their family and then sporadically reminding you of this. This movie doesn't introduce the cops' personal lives until there's like 15 minutes left of the film. You already care about them, more or less, but they throw this at you just before the climax which was extremely f'king effective in my opinion. I don't know if I've seen another movie do this before. Brilliant storytelling. It's a very intense, exciting and rebellious movie. The plot moves fast and the movie is over before you know it. The score is a main reason to why the movie works as well, I really loved it. If you have a chance to catch this movie, do it. 108 min Comedy, Drama, War 58 A young boy in Hitler's army finds out his mother is hiding a Jewish girl in their home. Taika Waititi Roman Griffin Davis, Thomasin McKenzie, Scarlett Johansson, 110, 756 0. 35M Funny, heart felt and well made. Taika Waititi indeed seems to be the second coming of Wes Anderson. This is his most accomplished work to date. What We Do in the Shadows may be a more inventive premise, but this is just as well told and it's more well made on a technical level and it's just as heart-felt as Boy. The acting is pretty great overall, although the accents were a bit inconsistent. However, since having your characters speaking English with the accent of the country the movie takes place in is a huge pet peeve of mine, I didn't mind the inconsistent accents. Roman Griffin Davis was great for a child actor. Thomasin McKenzie was also great, she's definitely improved from her work in Leave No Trace. Scarlett Johanson was also great, although I'm not quite sure if she deserved an Oscar nod for this movie, when she already had one secured with Marriage Story. And then the cast is filled to the brim with great side characters with lots of funny moments each. Although, let's not forget about Waititi himself. He's a great Hitler. He does strike me as a bit self-obsessed, but he handles it very well and he has moments when he's not just doing comedy and he still commands the screen. The movie is very well shot. Again, the Wes Anderson influence is strong, but he seems to be adapting his own style more and more. Everyone seems to be loving this movie and I'm not opposed to that. Check it out if you haven't, it's solid. 102 min Comedy 84 On the eve of their high school graduation, two academic superstars and best friends realize they should have worked less and played more. Determined not to fall short of their peers, the girls try to cram four years of fun into one night. Olivia Wilde Kaitlyn Dever, Beanie Feldstein, Jessica Williams, Jason Sudeikis 64, 188 22. 68M This was a delight! I seem to have a particular fondness for high school movies and 'young people partying movies. This movie is what it is. It's not trying to be anything other than a high school/young people partying movie. It's vibrant, fast paced, well shot, acted and so much fun. It's basically Superbad from a woman's perspective. I like Superbad - it's a nostalgic movie for me, but initially I feel like I like this more. This felt more wholesome. It's not as black and white. It gives the role players much more things to do, which is exactly what I strive for when I write my own sh*t. The writing is definitely my favorite part of the movie. Thre's only one thing I didn't like about it. I was fearing that it would happen throughout the entire film and it did, because it always has to happen in comedies. The two main characters has to get upset with each other to transition the second act into the third. I hated it when it happened. In the grand scheme of things, it's fine I guess, but I wouldn't put it past this movie to not do it. I trusted that this movie was smart enough to do something different. That's pretty much it. I loved it, but like I said, it is what it is. Drama, Romance, Sport 80 Traces the journey of a suburban family - led by a well-intentioned but domineering father - as they navigate love, forgiveness, and coming together in the aftermath of a loss. Trey Edward Shults Taylor Russell, Kelvin Harrison Jr., Alexa Demie, Bill Wise 6, 298 Waves is a beautiful and heartbreaking drama with stellar performances. It's a movie that really understands young people. As a young person I understood and bought every bit of general behavior, interraction with technology, music at parties etc. There's alot of music in this movie. Often when a movie does this, it's just the director flexing with their favorite songs. However, the songs played had more often than not a thematic connection to the scene. When he fights with his girlfriend they play a Tyler the Creator song called IFHY. Not only is that one of my favorite songs, but the lyrics synced up perfectly with the scene taking place - both in significance and in tone. They also did some interesting things with the songs, like slow them down or alter them subtly. Basically Trey Edward Shults used all parts of the buffalo. This cast is one of the strongest of the year. Honestly, I'm a bit upset that Sterling K. Brown wasn't nominated for an Oscar. He brings so much depth to the character with his performance. He perfectly sells the stirn father with a heart of gold. He does a great job holding back tears as much as possible, which is more emotional to see than someone just plain crying. Everyone else does a great job as well. There are no weak spots. Even Lucas Hedges, who I'm not a fan of, does a great job with his part. Which transitions into my next point I'd like to bring up. This movie takes a sharp turn at one point. There's one thing lurking around the corner for a time, it hits and it's crazy. At that point it cuts to black and I thought I'd just experienced the shortest 2 hours and 15 minutes of my entire life. But then it fades in again and the movie becomes completely different. At first I thought it was an epilogue of sorts, but it kept going and going. It was a bit jarring to watch, because I had no idea where things were going. Then, the longer we get into it, the more clear things become as to what the movie is trying to say and it all suddenly makes sense. Although, I do have to say that one of the sequences had a prolonged exposure. At that point I knew what we were leaning into directly and was just waiting for it to hit. Trey Edward Shults has a clear voice at this point. There were a bunch of stylistic choices that made me go "Ah yes, classic Shults. He definitely knows how to use filmmaking to his advantage in order to tell the story. There's a great usage of aspect ratio. It changes and makes what we're about to see much more immersive. He's not the first person to do this, but he did it well nevertheless. Check this one out if you haven't. G 93 min Documentary, History 88 A look at the Apollo 11 mission to land on the moon led by commander Neil Armstrong and pilots Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins. Todd Douglas Miller Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, Buzz Aldrin, Deke Slayton 15, 776 9. 04M I loved how matter of fact this was. There's a framing device with an archival narrator, which I think is Walter Cronkite, explaining the things that will concurr in the upcoming step, accompanied by simplistic but detailed graphics. As someone who's not particularly informed on this stuff, I really appreciated that. The movie is all archive footage and audio and I loved that. There's nothing wrong with talking heads documentaries or ones heavily dependant on narration, but it is a very common thing. So, it's nice to see when a documentary shies away from doing that and when there's so much footage at your disposal, I don't see any reason for doing that anyway. It goes so far that it almost functions as a regular movie. I loved this. Like, I'd watch this over First Man any day of the week. No disrespect to Damien Chazelle, he made an objectively good movie, but this handled the subject much better. It was more engaging and emotionally resonating for me - even though I'm not that much into documentaries. It had an amazingly brisk pace, it had a great score which amplified all the key moments, it was very effective at doing its job and it wasn't overly patriotic either. 95 min 55 A rebellious stoner named Moondog lives life by his own rules. Harmony Korine Matthew McConaughey, Snoop Dogg, Isla Fisher, Stefania LaVie Owen 13, 986 3. 49M If you're looking for a standard stoner movie or something realistic, you won't find it here. I don't know why you'd think that if you knew anything about Harmony Korine. With that being said, though, I think this is his most accessible movie yet. It's really weird still, but it's basically just a Dazed and Confused type movie with the stylization of a Harmony Korine film. I really liked it. However, I have no objections towards you if you hate it. You're either into this kind of sh*t or you're not. His films are always polarizing, this is as well. There's nothing really controversial in this one, though. There are no consequences to anything. You can accuse this movie for being irresponsible and for glorifying immoral behavior, but that is once again if you interpret this as a realistic story - It's not. If anything, I'd call this a fairytale. So, what is there to praise about this film's technical achievements? I gotta say, Matthew McConnaughey usually gets cast in roles where he just plays himself, but if there's one thing he does well it's playing a stoner. Never once did I see him, I only saw Moondog. There are some really fun cameos by Zac Efron and Martin Lawrence. I really liked Isla Fischer's character as well. Snoop Dogg is always going to be Snoop Dogg. It doesn't matter how much you try to hide his persona. The movie looks gorgeous. I love this new visual style that Harmony Korine has adapted. I'm not looking at complete garbage anymore, my eyes are instead pleased and drawn to the screen. There were quite alot of scenes shot during sunup and sundown and it added so much more depth to the scenes. When your movie's about nothing, the least it can do is to be shot well and The Beach Bum certainly does not disappoint in that aspect. If you know what you're getting yourself into, then you probably already know what you're opinion on the movie is going to be. That is my recommendation. 6/10 121 min Drama A young man searches for home in the changing city that seems to have left him behind. Joe Talbot Jimmie Fails, Jonathan Majors, Rob Morgan, Tichina Arnold 8, 548 4. 52M This is a hell of a first feature. It's stylised, well shot and well told. The script is great and the acting as well. You have two really solid main performances from Jimmie Fails and Jonathan Majors - who reminded me so much of Mykelti Williamson, by the way. Then you surround these two by a whole bunch of solid supporting performances as well. Everyone sold their part and that adds so much depth and character to the film. Even Gunna managed to do a good job. Granted, he didn't have that much to do, but he was convincing nevertheless. It's one of the things I praised the most about last year's favorite movie of mine, Blindspotting. This movie is similar in a couple of ways, actually. The score was somewhat similar to my second favorite movie from last year, Under the Silver Lake. This is mostly used in the first act, though. So, you have simlarities between this movie and my two favorite movies from last year. So, how come this isn't higher on the list? You may ask. Well, during the first act I was thinking about placing this somewhere between Dragged Across Concrete and The Dead Don't Die. However, the movie sort of settles into no man's land for a while. Sure, alot of stuff is built up during this, but it does feel like it overstays its welcome, slightly. It focuses alot on the house and although that's not necessarily a bad thing - it is an integral part to the story - I was hoping that it would explore the surroundings more. In the end, it is more about the city than it is about the house. It doesn't take away too much from the film, though. Just enough to drop down a few spots for me. It looks great. The cinematography is well done and shots are supported with lots of natural lighting, it appears. The sound is great too, it has quite attention to detail. Their voices sound open when they're in open areas and at one point they go into a small room packed with stuff and it really sound like they're in there. Definitely worth your time. 7/10, might be an 8 later on, though. Not Rated 96 min Comedy, Horror 86 Things go badly for a hack director and film crew shooting a low budget zombie movie in an abandoned WWII Japanese facility, when they are attacked by real zombies. Shin'ichirô Ueda Takayuki Hamatsu, Yuzuki Akiyama, Harumi Shuhama, Kazuaki Nagaya 11, 218 Don't look up sh*t before watching this movie and you'll have a blast. It's one of the most unique movies of the year. It's one of the funnest movies of the year, but that's only solidified in the third act, in my opinion. The first act is crazy and really confusing at parts. It's both great and sh*tty cinematography at the same time. The second act is all set-up for the third act and it's definitely the slowest one. The acting is still kind of cheesy, but it works. It continues this in the third act, but that's also where every piece falls together and it's possibly the most fun I've had watching a movie this year. It's not the best thing I've seen all year. It's not even the best zombie movie I've seen. However, I was all up in it. Every bit of confusion from the first act is explained in the most satisfying of ways. It flew by so fast as well! Because, I'm watching this movie thinking I have about 25 minutes left and all of the sudden the movie is over. Phenomenal pacing. My hat's off to the filmmakers for coming up with this concept. I will definitely watch this again with some friends. It's not my favorite of the year, mostly because of the second act being not as interesting as the rest. This is a movie that everyone should be watching, though. 132 min 96 A poor family, the Kims, con their way into becoming the servants of a rich family, the Parks. But their easy life gets complicated when their deception is threatened with exposure. Bong Joon Ho Kang-ho Song, Sun-kyun Lee, Yeo-jeong Jo, Woo-sik Choi 227, 116 No stones left un-turned. That is going to be my review for this movie. I don't think he'll ever top Memories of Murder for me, personally, but I don't see why I should give this movie anything other than a 10/10 81 min Animation, Drama, Fantasy A story of Naoufel, a young man who is in love with Gabrielle. In another part of town, a severed hand escapes from a dissection lab, determined to find its body again. Jérémy Clapin Hakim Faris, Victoire Du Bois, Patrick d'Assumçao, Alfonso Arfi 15, 518 I watched this after a loong and hard work day, so my brain was pretty fried at the time. I think I missed the subtext of this movie, but I still very much enjoyed it. It was artistic and almost poetic in the way it was told. The characters were really well rounded. I liked both of them very much. The hand's journey was also very satisfying to watch. There's not a whole lot of dialogue in this movie and there doesn't need to be. Because this score is godd*mn amazing. It might be my favorite score of the year so far. The animation was very anime-like. Somewhat inconsistent in its fluidity, but hey, that might've also been a stylistic choice. I think it's more of a rendering failure, though. Granted, this isn't colossally distracting or anything, I figured I had to bring it up, that's all. I would recommend this to pretty much everyone. Even if some people would call this kind of movie "artsy-fartsy" I still think the animation element could keep that crowd somewhat engaged as well. I would have to watch it again in order to connect all the dots, but I can still say for certain that it's a quality film worth your time. 137 min Comedy, Drama, Romance 93 Noah Baumbach's incisive and compassionate look at a marriage breaking up and a family staying together. Noah Baumbach Julia Greer, Azhy Robertson 166, 575 Noah Baumbach has this way about him where he writes complex love stories, life hardships and intense arguing, making it seem almost effortless. To make a career out of this, to have this level of realistic dialogue being the backbone of your entire filmography while also consistently keeping the pace at an incredible pace, is not an easy thing to pull off. I haven't been through his entire filmography, but I've seen his first film, his last film and a handfull inbetween. He's like a modern Woody Allen. What Woody did in the 70's and the 80's is, in my opinion, the equivelant of what Baumbach is doing right now. This is an astute observation of a family going through a divorce and it is a roller coaster. It's a story that gets perspective on both parties and makes you sympathize with both of them. It's a story that takes several turns to the unexpected. You kind of feel like you're the one being dragged through this mess and that you're the one fighting for the custody of your child. You feel so much for these characters. You just want them both to succeed and yell at them when they make a mistake. He's made two movies, that I've seen, that are about divorce and they're completely different from each other. As much as this succeeded at what it was going for, I think that The Squid and the Whale was a worse experience - in a good way. But, let's not just credit Noah Baumbach for the movie turning out to be what it was. The acting is excellent, some of the best of the year. Adam Driver and Scarlett Johanson both give astounding performances. I see Oscar nominations coming both their ways, maybe even wins. I wouldn't object to any of them winning. There's one great scene with Scarlett Johanson done mostly in one shot where she really gets to bring out her acting chops. Adam Driver also gets his shining moments, one in particular when they're arguing wih each other in his apartment. The supporting cast is great as well. Laura Dern, Julie Hagerty and Ray Liotta are great. F'king Bob Fossil showed up briefly as a judge. Holy sh*t, that caught me off guard. If I have one issue with the film it's a couple of strange things that happens. One of them sort of makes sense at that point in the story, but it's never brought up again. The other thing is very random and weird. I mean, it's a fun scene, but it comes from nowhere and it's also never brought up again even though it would seem like a very problematic situation. It does push one plot point to its end, I suppose, but it's just brushed off completely. It was so weird. It doesn't really matter, though. It's shot a bit too dry for me to give it a perfect score. I would prefer a story like this to be shot more like Short Cuts or something for me to do so. It's close, though. I believe that Marriage Story nails its intent. 100 min 89 A Chinese family discovers their grandmother has only a short while left to live and decide to keep her in the dark, scheduling a wedding to gather before she dies. Lulu Wang Shuzhen Zhao, Awkwafina, X Mayo, Hong Lu 28, 769 16. 88M It's very rare that I cry when I watch a movie, so even when a movie reaches the point to where I might start crying anytime, I'm impressed by this. This movie didn't make me cry, but it did sniff around the area. This is just a really solid movie on all fronts. I would say the strongest aspect of the movie is the acting. Awkwafina makes me think of Bojack Horseman every time I hear her name, but she gave a fantastic performance. It's because of her acting that I felt like I might start crying at one point. I certainly hope that she'll get an Oscar nod. Fingers crossed, the nominations are announced tomorrow. But everyone else did great as well. The cousin getting married, in particular, made me feel for him. He didn't get much screentime, but whenever he was there he made it convincing that he was going through alot. The movie is also shot really well. It looks super professional in its framing and shot composition. It also feels purposeful in how it's shot. It's not just shot in a slightly different way just to be that - different. It signifies everything weighing on the characters' heads and what they're going through. It's obviously not the first movie to do this, but it's still a nice touch. There's one really distracting continuity error during an argument scene. It involves a spinning food table. The different plates jumps across the table between the shots. It's constantly spinning slowly as if it's operated by machinery, but for the wide shots it doesn't move at all. The argument in the scene is very interesting, but it kept throwing me off. The story is really moving. It's well written. It's really sad, but also really sweet. The grandma is so loveable. I thought something would be revealed at the end - not the main thing, but another one - but it wasn't. It's not exactly established if the thing actually is a thing or not, but it could be. The actual farewell felt very mutual, so it clould be. I would recommend this to everyone, except for maybe the "Snyder-Cut" people. 95 On an isolated island in Brittany at the end of the eighteenth century, a female painter is obliged to paint a wedding portrait of a young woman. Céline Sciamma Noémie Merlant, Adèle Haenel, Luàna Bajrami, Valeria Golino 15, 047 Really great movie. The story is riveting, the acting is superb, the directing is spot-on, it looks amazing etc. You can understand every character's decision at any given point. I loved that there were barely any male characters, it gave the movie a completely different dynamic than what it could've been otherwise. There isn't even a mention of Héloïse's father, it's her mother that is pulling all the strings. The build up to their romance is utterly satisfying. It takes its sweet time without feeling tedious. Every scene is there for a reason - adding that to great shot composition and likable characters makes for a joyful experience. I really liked the scene at the big fire when all the women started doing acapella music. It was a callback to when Héloïse talked about how she wanted to hear music and it makes the implication that all these women are feeling the same way in their various situations. It's a wonderful moment that isn't talked about, it's just presented to us with no sugar coating. I loved that the maid is drinking a bottle of wine in this scene. It also supplies us with the shot on the poster, which is a great shot. The music also comes back at the very end to execute a very satisfying climax. There's no other music throughout the entire film, so when it does appear it's more significant. Everyone needs to watch this movie. Documentary 76 A look at the quick rise and influence of the controversial religious group known as The Satanic Temple. Penny Lane Jex Blackmore, Chalice Blythe, Nicholas Crowe, Sal De Ciccio 3, 783 0. 42M This sounded like a fun documentary about a crazy satanic extremist group. I had no idea how much I would get invsted in their plight. I'm not a satanist by any means, but I am strongly against the conservative Christians and their hostility towards a society that is all about equal rights. I found myself agreeing with alot of what this satanic group had to say, which is not something I thought I'd hear myself saying 90 minutes ago. I don't think that Christianity should just be thrown out the f'king window, but if not then other religions should also be taken into consideration or else it ceases to be a democracy. Everything is constantly being updated in our day-to-day lives - how come religion isn't one of those things? Something that was constructed thousands of years ago is a product of its time and should be looked upon with an objective and unbiased point of view. This is the kind of discussion that this documentary warrants and it's why I kind of loved it. So let's talk about the actual movie. It's shot and presented in a fairly basic way. This is not a movie that you watch for its technical achievements. Although, the moments where it showed archival footage were often times very effective and eye opening. Another example of the movie using filmmaking to its advantage was when they revealed a twist in the latter half of the movie. It was hinted at in the early stages of the film, but subtle enough to where you don't think too much of it. When the bomb hits, it makes sense. These are great technical things, but as a whole it's a bit flat which might disinterest some people. The co-founder came off as a really likable guy. There seemed to be absolutely no mean spiritedness about him at all. Sure, he was a bit quirky, but so are alot of great people. I would suggest everyone checking this out. It's definitely a conversation starter. 139 min 81 Two sisters born in Rio de Janeiro make their way through life, each mistakenly believing the other is living out her dreams half a world away. Karim Aïnouz Julia Stockler, Carol Duarte, Flávia Gusmão, António Fonseca 2, 173 A very well made melodrama. It has a great pace, nothing is lingered on for too long. You have two fantastic central performances that holds everything together. They both brings such life into their characters and sell every little moment of strength and vulnurability. The writing also helped the actors to better define their roles. Euridice for example constantly makes up for people that are in control and as soon as she has the upper hand the roles are reversed and she subjects the counterpart to what she'd been through every time. All of it culminates into an extremely satisfying climax. It would be easy to go for clichés here, but I don't think they did. No spoilers today, but what they did was so much better. Bring some tissues for this one. On a normal day I would've probably broken down crying at the end, but for some reason I had Money for Nothing by Dire Straits stuck in my head for the entire runtime of the film. It managed to pop back whenever there was a high dramatic moment and prevented me from shedding any tears. I think there might be something wrong with me. 147 min Drama, Horror, Mystery 72 A couple travels to Sweden to visit a rural hometown's fabled mid-summer festival. What begins as an idyllic retreat quickly devolves into an increasingly violent and bizarre competition at the hands of a pagan cult. Ari Aster Jack Reynor, Vilhelm Blomgren, William Jackson Harper 114, 579 27. 33M This was basically what I expected. If Ari Aster didn't prove himself to be a great director with a bright future ahead of him with Hereditary, then this should've brought it home for you. I don't think that this was as good as Hereditary, though. Mainly because of the horror elements. While Hereditary definitely feels like a horror movie, this one didn't really get under my skin at all. I seemed to tackle this more as a who-done-it kind of movie, because it did keep me interested throughout, oh yes sir. But, I was never scared like I was in Hereditary and that's totally fine. Regardless on what your standpoints are of whether this is scary or not, there's no denying the craft put into the making of this movie. It's very meticulous on all the filmmaking aspects - the directing, cinematography, lighting, sound design. Everything in the story was foreshadowed, no stones left 's what I assume anyway. There's one thing I don't really understand as of right now - the smile. If you know, you know, I'm not elaborating on it. I would give praise if it was actually shot in Sweden, but I can tell as a swede myself that it's definitely not. Which is strange, I don't really see why it wasn't. I noticed that there was a lot of hungarian sounding names in the crew, so my guess is that it's shot there. Again, don't really understand why, cheaper I guess? But you notice that right away. When I saw The House That Jack Built, I had no idea that it was shot in Sweden, but you could tell right off the bat. If it were just a mediocre whatever-movie I wouldn't really care, but because of the quality to the rest of the film I have to adress it. The acting is great. I'd really want for Florence Pugh to be considered coming award season, because she did a fantastic job thoughout. Everyone else were good too, Jack Reynor also gives his best performance to date. TV-14 106 min 85 In a popular suburb of Dakar, workers on the construction site of a futuristic tower, without pay for months, decide to leave the country by the ocean for a better future. Among them is Souleiman, the lover of Ada, promised to another. Mati Diop Mame Bineta Sane, Amadou Mbow, Traore, Nicole Sougou 4, 372 Going into this film I was expecting a fairly standard but stylized love story, like Moonlight or something. This movie had alot more interesting stuff going for it, though. Especially the score. The score was great in my opinion! It really hepled make the scenes more captivating. I liked all the minor characters. I liked the story. I liked the execution of the more surreal scenes. I liked that the detective was called Issa Diop, because I kept imagining him being the football player for West Ham United. This is just me listing off things I liked about the movie. I don't seem to have that much to say about it other than that. It's not the most amazing movie of the year, but it is pretty cool. 118 min Biography, Comedy, Drama Eddie Murphy portrays real-life legend Rudy Ray Moore, a comedy and rap pioneer who proved naysayers wrong when his hilarious, obscene, kung-fu fighting alter ego, Dolemite, became a 1970s Blaxploitation phenomenon. Craig Brewer Eddie Murphy, Keegan-Michael Key, Mike Epps, Craig Robinson 38, 115 Fun movie. Conventionally, it's a standard biopic. It hits all the beats that most biopics do. It's not an amazing movie. Everyone does a fine job whether it's in front of or behind the camera, but there's nothing groundbreaking about it. I loved that it didn't try to tug on your heart strings and go for any sentimental stuff, because thats not what you think about when you think about Rudy Ray Moore. Which, by the way, if you haven't seen any of his films then you need to do so immediately. I think the movie could do a better job at capturing his essence. They do a fine job, but once again, nothing amazing. It's an easy watch, though. It put a perpetual smile on my face. Biography, Drama Based on the true story of a real-life friendship between Fred Rogers and journalist Lloyd Vogel. Marielle Heller Tom Hanks, Matthew Rhys, Chris Cooper, Susan Kelechi Watson 23, 298 This is quite possibly the cheesiest movie I've seen this year, but I really liked it. I was going to watch Won't You Be My Neighbor? before watching this, but I didn't have time. I may have been harsher on this movie if I had, but I haven't and I won't. I liked the framing device of this whole movie being an episode of Mr. Roger's show. I liked that almost every establishing shot was shot with old TV cameras and models, like his show. I liked the dream sequence, I didn't expect something like that showing up in this movie. Tom Hanks was great, the movie really excelled whenever he was on screen. Everyone else were servicable, though. There's a huge difference between them and I don't think this movie would work without Tom Hanks. There are directing decisions that are good as well, but the movie wouldn't be higher than a 5 and that's being generous then. I had a perpetual smile on my face while watching him interract with people. I'm glad he got an Oscar nomination, although I don't think he should win. This is not a great movie, though. Besides cheese, it's the most predictable thing in the world. You know within 5 minutes everything that's going to transpire, so I can totally understand if someone hates this movie. The scene on the park bench was silly, because they've been married for 8 years. She would already know this, he shoudln't have to tell her. The scene on the train was so f'king cheesy that even I cringed. It was blatantly obvious what the scene in the restaurant was going for and they did push it a bit too far. A few seconds would've been fine, not 20. It's good, it warmed my stone cold heart, Tom Hanks gives a lovable performance playing a lovable guy and it has some neat directing. 57 A widow investigates an insurance fraud, chasing leads to a pair of Panama City law partners exploiting the world's financial system. Gary Oldman, Antonio Banderas, AJ Meijer, Arsenio Castellanos 32, 364 It's basically a documentary in disguise. Very similar to movies like The Wolf of Wall Street and The Big Short. It's not as charismatic and vibrant as The Wolf of Wall Street and it's not as obnoxious and insisting as The Big Short. It's the same concept with the style and filmmaking competence of Steven Soderbergh. I can see a complaint being that all of the narrative stuff with Meryl Streep and co. is somewhat pointless, that it's just exposition ontop of exposition and really just wants to be a documentary. But I mean, I still enjoyed it. It's not perfect, but nothing about it is horribly made. For instance: No matter what the story is, you can always count on interesting cinematography and shot composition in a Steven Soderbergh movie. The acting is always good and his movies are seldom slow and boring. I think that's what I love about him. Although, if I'm going to choose between the two movies he's made this year I'm going to choose High Flying Bird. This is still good, but I've seen these kinds of movies before while I've never encountered a movie about an NBA lockout before. Adventure, Drama, Thriller On a remote mountaintop, eight kids with guns watch over a hostage and a conscripted milk cow. Alejandro Landes Sofia Buenaventura, Julián Giraldo, Karen Quintero, Laura Castrillón 6, 563 This is a strange one. It's sort of structured like Mean Streets or Dazed and Confused - but with terrorists and I think that's why I liked it. It has a crazy score and some cool visuals. The subject matter, like it or not, it is something new. Some of the characters we didn't really get to know at all, like Boom Boom. Like, who was he even? He showed up here and there, but he never really had anything to do in this movie. Both Smurf and Dog were just held captured at some point and nothing else. With the others you got something to chew on at least. So, that was a bit of a missed opportunity if you ask me. I do like that the whole terrosist angle was just a backdrop. We never got an extensive explanation of the situation at hand. I'm not familiar with the current political climate in Colombia so I don't know if this is an actual thing or not, but either way it doesn't really matter. You can imagine the whole thing in your head without the movie telling you anything about it. The same thing goes for the white woman. You're not quite sure what she's about at first, until it goes on a bit and you figure it out for yourself. You do figure it out fairly quickly, I'm just saying that we never got an exposition dump about it. More movies need to do things like this. I liked the first half of the movie more than the second half. The first half felt more ambiguous as to what it was going for and I wished that they did more stuff on that hill. When they got to the jungle, it was still good, but it felt more familiar. They do a very on-the-nose homage to Lord of the Flies, which is one of the things it started to feel derivative of in the second half. I would still highly recommend it, though. 105 min 66 Shmuel, a Hasidic cantor in upstate New York, distraught by the untimely death of his wife, struggles to find religious solace, while secretly obsessing over how her body will decay. Shawn Snyder Géza Röhrig, Matthew Broderick, Sammy Voit, Sarah Jes Austell 634 0. 18M I wanted to watch this just out of curiosity of the main actor. This is the guy from Son of Saul, it's his first movie since and it's in english. It met my expectations. He proved that he wasn't just a one off actor with Son of Saul. Obviously that's a better movie than this, but he still did a great job with this role. He managed to pull off being sad and sympathetic and at the same time being hilarious. There were quite a few laughs in this movie for me and it's all from the interracting between Géza Röhrig and Matthew Broderick. On paper it sounds like an odd duo and it still is, but it worked really well. They play off each other perfectly. The movie isn't amazing. It's a movie about accepting death. The sequence of events shouldn't really be taken too literally, it's comedic for the most part. It is pretty slow and I think some people will find it boring. I don't have that much to say about it. You can rent it on Youtube if you want to check it out. 99 min Action, Comedy, Horror Columbus, Tallahassee, Wichita, and Little Rock move to the American heartland as they face off against evolved zombies, fellow survivors, and the growing pains of the snarky makeshift family. Ruben Fleischer Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin 81, 552 26. 80M If you like the tone and comedy style of the first one, then you'll probably enjoy this one as well. I like Zombieland, it's not a favorite or anything, but I can watch it whenever. Thus, I enjoyed this sequel as well. It doesn't add anything new to the table. It doesn't offer any services that the first one didn't already. I think it's the fact that it doesn't take itself seriously that makes it okay for me. It's very tounge in cheek and it was, in a way, a parody of itself. It doesn't look amazing, it doesn't have amazing writing, acting or filmmaking in general. Watching the trailer I thought I would hate Zoey Deutch's character. However, I think the fact that she was played by Zoey Deutch made me not hate her, because I like her as an actress and she did a good job. Honestly, she's kind of the most memorable part of the movie. It was also fun to see Avan Jogia in this role after Now Apocalypse. The Pisa scene looked like garbage, that's probably my biggest complaint. Also, grown up Abigail Breslin reminds me alot of Natasha Lyonne. We're in a time where Hollywood are completely creatively bankrupt and we, more often than not, get unnecessary sequels and prequels that nobody asked for or even knew that they didn't want. Zombieland: Double Tap is a sequel that nobody knew they wanted or didn't want and yet, here it is. On paper I should hate it, but I guess that I'm not exactly as black and white as the hippies portrayed in this movie. There's no real need to watch this movie. If you like the first one, then maybe give this a shot. I liked it. It probably has the same rewatchability as the first one for me. But, you're not missing anything if you decide to let this one slip through the cracks. 5/10 Action, Adventure, Mystery 74 After the death of her grandmother, Teresa comes home to her matriarchal village in a near-future Brazil to find a succession of sinister events that mobilizes all of its residents. Juliano Dornelles, Kleber Mendonça Filho Bárbara Colen, Thomas Aquino, Silvero Pereira, Thardelly Lima 8, 714 The scenes generally go on for a bit too long. They could've made this a 90-105 minute film instead. The final sequence, especially could've been trimmed down significantly. All the scenes with the bad guys were pretty bad in my opinion. It was clear that their dialogue were written by people who aren't american and gets their american culture from action movies and such. There was a scene when Udo Kier told one of his guys to do something less clichéd the next time, but the scene in itself is a huge cliché. So the scene eats its own tail all while not being self aware about it. Besides from this the movie is decent. The story is interesting. The set up of it taking place in the near future doesn't have much of a payoff. There's a drone and a translation device, but that's it. I liked all the Bacurauians. I liked that the entire village was a collective and interracted with each other throughout the entire film. It looks good and the acting is solid. It's a fun movie, that takes a bit too long. 92 min 79 A police officer faces a personal meltdown following a divorce and the death of his mother. Jim Cummings Jim Cummings, Kendal Farr, Nican Robinson, Jocelyn DeBoer 11, 705 An interesting character study of a man having a mental breakdown. Unlike The Joker where it just feels derivative and the most surface-level kind of character writing imaginable, this is about a man whose life's gradually getting worse and worse by his own doing. Jim Cummings doesn't just set up a bunch of tragic things happening to him that anyone with a pen and paper can mimic, he writes it so that you constantly questions the main character's actions. By doing so, he makes the movie feel more genuine. If you drag your main character through enough sh*t, then of course you'll have to feel sorry for them, but it's the choices like the ones made in this movie that makes the movie feel more like a challenging experience. They make the end product feel more earned. The movie starts out on a wrong note, in my opinion. Jim Cummings does a pretty great job in general acting in this movie, but one thing he doesn't do well is crying and the opening scene is all crying. He does anger and desperation pretty well, it's just whenever he tries to cry it feels fake. It started off wrong and made me not love the next 30 minutes of the film. I got more into it the further it went though for reasons already explained. The cinematography is pretty good as well. There are several scenes when the camera holds on a shot and slowly zooming in on the character in focus. It's a good way to letting the performance shine instead of cutting between several different shots and disrupting the actor letting all their talent out there. This is obviously not the first film to do this - I'm just saying that in less talented hands it could've turned out poorly. Check it out. It is pretty depressing and I wouldn't call it a comedy, but that's just me. 113 min 87 A film director reflects on the choices he's made as past and present come crashing down around him. Pedro Almodóvar Asier Etxeandia, Leonardo Sbaraglia, Nora Navas 32, 703 It's a strange thing. Prior to watching this I'd only seen old Almodóvar films and it's like two completely different people. And while this is a solid movie, I actually prefer his older, fast moving, vibrant and rebellious work. Maybe I'll do a complete 180 in 20 years from now, but as it stands, no. The movie is really well made. The cinematography is gorgeous. The way all the colors pops out from the screen was almost mesmerizing at times. It gave the movie a really warm and comfortable tone, which also felt a bit strange - but in a good way. The subject matter isn't exactly matching of the look of the film, but it still kind of worked. In hindsight, it felt a bit strange when you think about it, but I was completely in it at the time. The reds look especially great. Antonio Banderas gives a great performance. I liked that he never cries, but rather tries to hold back tears as much as possible. It's way more emotional to witness, in my opinion. It's also interesting because that's exactly what his character tells the actor to do in the play. Antonio Banderas is playing Pedro Almodóvar and is directing a guy who's playing Antonio Banderas, maybe? I haven't exactly looked into it, but I know that they didn't work together for about 20 years either. It's way too similar to real life to just be a coincidence. It's safe to say that the movie is very meta - certified by the last scene which I'm not going to spoil. The only off thing about the movie would be the pacing. It starts off with a heavy emphasis on his working relationship with the actor. However, after the second act or so, he vanishes from the film and we get this concentrated focus on his relationship with his mother. In my opinion, for the movie to flow better, you combine both of these storylines together. Maybe you disagree with me, that's fine. Nevertheless, it's a good movie. Perhaps not the movie I wanted, although still worth your time. 98 min Adventure, Drama 71 A man stranded in the Arctic after a plane crash must decide whether to remain in the relative safety of his makeshift camp or to embark on a deadly trek through the unknown. Joe Penna Mads Mikkelsen, Maria Thelma Smáradóttir, Tintrinai Thikhasuk 34, 859 2. 41M Good movie. Mads Mikkelsen gives a great performance. It's amplified by the film being shot on location. You could feel every breath, every step, every setback as if you were there because it wasn't shot on a sound stage or something. Didn't know Mystery Guitar Man had it in him. There's not much of a story to this. The movie opens up and boom - you're in it. There's no prologue of him crashing his airplane. It begins and you know wihin the first 5 minutes that he's already been there for a while without the movie spelling it out for you. The rest of it is him trying to figure his way out of the situation. A few turns here and there to keep the movie refreshing. The movie is a bit repetitive. However, I will turn the other cheek because the entire situation is repetitive and we're just shown bluntly how it goes down. The sequence of events are somewhat predictable, not all of it obviously, but one plot point in particular. I could see it from a mile away and it didn't exactly go anywhere. I guess if it did then it would be too much like The Revenant. Oh well, that's not really what the movie's about anyway. It's a survival movie and it's pretty good. 77 While the yearly crab migration takes place and locals perform rituals for ghosts, a therapist works in Christmas Island's asylum seeker detention center. Gabrielle Brady Arthur Floret, Poh Lin Lee 332 Decent documentary with great cinematography, sound design and a fantastic score. Now, there are several things going on in this film and sadly, I don't think they blended well together. The refugee storyline is probably the most interesting part of the film. It's emotional and gave me an insight into something I had no idea about. This ties with another storyline, the main woman who works with the refugees. We get to see alot of her home life, which some if it is necessary to the first one, but some of it isn't. The road trips with the family aren't that interesting. There's not too much of it, but still. Then you have the crab part. We follow this road worker who tries to keep the crabs from being run over by cars, getting stuck in the mud and stuff like that, which honestly is also something that we didn't really need. However, I would be happy if all of this was a montage of nature shots and crabs wandering through the island. That's where the movie really shines for me. Ironically, the "hungry ghosts" part is the least interesting thing about the movie and it's disconnected from everything else going on. Oh, sure there's a vague connection with the people praying for the souls lost on the island, but that's just for the original inhabitants. The movie may be inclined to tell you that there's this deeper message to it, but the people practicing it doesn't give a sh*t about that. They just practiced their superstitions. It's the worst thing about the movie and it's the reason why I watched the movie - funny how that goes sometimes. You may be preparing yourselves for an unfair score, but truth of the matter is that the technical aspects of this film are so impressive. It really carries the film on it's shoulders, especially the cinematography and score. Extremely captivating stuff. It props up the film to a solid rating. Drama, Mystery, Thriller 37 A fishing boat captain juggles facing his mysterious past and finding himself ensnared in a reality where nothing is what it seems. Steven Knight Anne Hathaway, Diane Lane, Jason Clarke 28, 960 8. 55M This was so stupid. Insisted significance, nonsensical dialogue, phony performances, all while taking itself so seriously. The first half was like an old soap opera called Sunset Beach and then it turned into Truman Show for idiots. Watch this if you want a good laugh, I guess. It's as stupid as Riverdale. 2/10 It's actually growing on me over time. I maintain my low rating, but it's really funny. 123 min Adventure, Drama, Mystery Astronaut Roy McBride undertakes a mission across an unforgiving solar system to uncover the truth about his missing father and his doomed expedition that now, 30 years later, threatens the universe. James Gray Tommy Lee Jones, Ruth Negga, Donald Sutherland 141, 432 35. 40M It's pretty much a different director's version of Interstellar - in the simplest terms. Of course, there are several things that differentiates these two films from each other, but I think the parallels are obvious. It's a fantastically looking space voyage with vast world building, a neat story and a solid central performance by Brad Pitt. The storytelling isn't bulletproof, though. There are quite alot of things that are thrown into the film without having that much of a bearing on the outcome. I can think of at least three things that are pretty much pointless to the plot. One of them includes a trek on the moon, one of them includes a couple of monkeys and the third one includes a person he meets on Mars. These subplots take up a decent amount of screentime for no reason. It's just filler. None of it really needs to be in the film at all. Both Donald Sutherland and Ruth Negga could be cut out of this movie completely. If you adjust the script so that Brad Pitt does everything on his own then I think the movie would be better, because as it is the movie does drag a bit. Everything else is high standard. Brad Pitt gives a quality performance and so does Tommy Lee Jones. The visuals are outstanding - on par with its predecessors. I would pick this as the Oscar winner for the techies this year. The score is great as well. The shot composition is also very good. James Gray certainly knows how to direct a film. So, maybe next time he should focus more on the script. Maybe it was different in written form and things just ended up getting cut. However, in that case, just cut it all out instead. It'd make the movie flow better and probably save you some money as well. 94 min 73 A young actor's stormy childhood and early adult years as he struggles to reconcile with his father and deal with his mental health. Alma Har'el Shia LaBeouf, Lucas Hedges, Noah Jupe, Byron Bowers 7, 947 Great acting and solid directing. It has a very dream-like tone to it in how scenes are edited together with the ambient score. Which is something I like very much. If you add that style of editing to smooth and crisp cinematography with strong colors, the movie receives almost a hypnotic sort of feel to it. I may be overstepping my boundaries here. The movie is good, but it's not a masterpiece. Most of this stuff comes off the fly while writing the review. I didn't have this exact experience while I actually watched it. I watched a good movie, that's all. Shia LaBeouf does give a great performance, though. He disappears into his character, which isn't surprising considering that he's playing his father. Who better to do it than him? The child actor was also pretty great for a child. Lucas Hedges was alright. He's certainly not as bad as he tends to be. However, his whole segment is very weak in comparison to the childhood part. You need his segment as a framing device, I get that, but we're not going to pretend as if it's anything near as good as the the other one. So, whenever we ended up going back to the adult stuff I just wanted it to be over with. I wanted to go back to Shia LaBeouf being a bad father his son, because it's far more interesting than a dude in rehab. 84 min Action, Adventure, Crime Two Brooklyn teenage prodigies, C. J. Walker and Sebastian Thomas, build makeshift time machines to save C. 's brother, Calvin, from being wrongfully killed by a police officer. Stefon Bristol Eden Duncan-Smith, Dante Crichlow, Astro, Marsha Stephanie Blake 7, 312 It's a fine movie. It's really corny, but I kind of liked it. I'm no scientist, but I'm sure that if I were I would point out all these inconsistencies in the logistics of their traveling through time. Like, they went to the same place at the same time every time without ever running into each other. They don't establish why running into themselves would be a bad thing. I get that they would need to avoid other people, but what stops them from telling their other selves to approach their plan differently? They could've gone back to Carlito's, avoid that one character and proceed with their fool-proof plan. It still works for me though. The characters are likable and well acted enough for me to care about them. I had no problems enjoying myself throughout. It's not a deep movie. It does have the subtext of police brutality against black people, but it's not like this is the first movie to tackle the subject. I mean, my favorite movie last year was Blindspotting which handled the subject matter in a much better way, so I can't really give it points for that. It's the first time travel movie to do that, which is something I guess? SPOILER I did like that there was no resolution to the problems. The implication is that she'll try until she makes it, but we don't get that inevitable happy ending where everything works out - like in Back to the Future which this movie obviously apes off. I found that refreshing at least. They didn't have to drag out Michael J. Fox for this. Seeing him just made me sad. I don't know what he's been doing lately, but he didn't look well. They also had him say "Great Scott" which was obnoxious. Watch this if you want a fun time without having to think too much about it. 107 min Action, Drama 75 An astronaut prepares for a one-year mission aboard the International Space Station. Alice Winocour Eva Green, Zélie Boulant, Matt Dillon, Aleksey Fateev 630 A pretty decent film. Eva Green gives her best performance in years. There is an obvious parrallel between her experience and her daughter's. They seem to ajust to their own environments around the same time, but also as they grow distance from each other. I liked that it doesn't continue along how it starts. I thought that it would just be a cliché thing about the boys club and that Matt Dillon would be the villain of the film. Thankfully they didn't do that and there was a clear purpose to it. Instead he becomes a friend and she becomes one with the team. There's one thing that throws a monkey wrench into the third act, though. This is spoiler territory so skip to the next paragraph to avoid it. I was very disappointed that there were absolutely no consequences to her leaving the quarantine to visit her daughter. Literally nothing. When the rocket launched I was expecting her to either have some medical issue or for the rocket to malfunction mid-launch because of her neglegence during the briefing scene. I guess that would stride against what the movie is about, sure, but here's another thing. I don't care how much the movie wants to suspend my disbeliefs, there is no way that no one would find out about it. These are astronauts going on a very high profile mission and there are absolutely no security guards neither at the quarantined area or at the launch site? No one noticed that she was gone for presumably several hours? The sun went up and everything. She managed to activate stealth mode during broad daylight and sneak into what should be a building with heavy security like she's f'king JC Denton? I'd accept it alot more and give the movie a higher score if they waited for her when she came back. Because they set up the guy who'd take over for her if she screwed up and she'd already be reunited with her daughter. It's so stupid how they constructed it. Well, anyway, it didn't ruin the movie for me. It just lowered the score. I still liked it. 125 min Behind Vatican walls, the conservative Pope Benedict XVI and the liberal future Pope Francis must find common ground to forge a new path for the Catholic Church. Fernando Meirelles Anthony Hopkins, Jonathan Pryce, Juan Minujín, Luis Gnecco 70, 991 Alright. I find myself not caring that much about this movie in either direction. I didn't dislike it at all, but there's nothing about it that sticks out as being great. I guess that the dialogue comes closest. However, it's far too repetitive for me to call it so. There are several times where information we already know is repeated. My favorite scene was the scene when they were arguing over each others' differing opinions. Although, it's not amazing or anything. I saw a movie a while back called The Sunset Limited which did this in an amazing way. In here, it's really tame in comparison and it's pretty much the only scene of this. It's not horrible at all, but it's not great either. It's alright. I kind of wish that there weren't any flashbacks to the young Jonathan Pryce. I think it would be better if all of it was told in monologue instead. I think adding more depth to the two lead performances would help the movie being pushed over the edge into the category of greatness. As it happens, the performances are a bit lackluster in my opinion. Jonathan Pryce is actually dubbed over multiple times. Whenever he's speaking spanish, it's very obviously someone else's voice. It's extremely distracting. It makes me ask the question, why was he cast if he wasn't going to be able to speak spanish? Why wasn't someone who does speak spanish cast instead? Don't get me wrong, they both do a fine job and I love Jonathan Pryce, but I wouldn't consider them great either. They're alright. Do you see where I'm going with this? People seem to like this movie. It's getting award buzz where I don't really think it should. I'm not outraged or anything, though, because like I said, I don't dislike this movie at all. I would just prefer if other movies got the buzz instead. I'm not religious, especially not catholic, so the story didn't exactly move me. The cinematography was a mixed bag. There are both great and terrible shots and it's style is very inconsistent. Watch this movie and decide for yourselves if you like it or not. I can certainly understand why people would like this. 101 min Hoping that self-employment through gig economy can solve their financial woes, a hard-up UK delivery driver and his wife struggling to raise a family end up trapped in the vicious circle of this modern-day form of labour exploitation. Ken Loach Kris Hitchen, Debbie Honeywood, Rhys Stone, Katie Proctor 5, 347 The expectations are set in stone. It's a Ken Loach film, you know exactly what you're going to get: A melancholic drama about working class people struggling with their lives in modern Britain. It's going to be a f'k you to the ones in charge. It's going to be gradual and at the end there's going to be a public stunt of some sort where a person/organization is being told off by the main characters. I don't mind a Ken Loach film every once in a while. They're not my favorite thing, but I'm always entertained. The drama always feels real, the characters are always likable and well performed by people I've never heard of. He's not a flashy filmmaker when it comes to his style. It's not of significance to him rather than to tell the story of the working class Brits. I can't really write a cohesive review about this movie without referring to every other Ken Loach film I've seen other than just explain the sequence of events. I'm not that kind of reviewer, so I won't be doing that. If you like his films, you'll like this one as well. If you haven't seen any, give this a shot. It's quality cinema, but you may want to have some tissues ready. Personally, it's not Looking For Eric, though. 119 min Drama, War April 6th, 1917. As a regiment assembles to wage war deep in enemy territory, two soldiers are assigned to race against time and deliver a message that will stop 1, 600 men from walking straight into a deadly trap. Sam Mendes Dean-Charles Chapman, George MacKay, Daniel Mays, Colin Firth 171, 408 Eeuyiiiiiaaauuooooh boy. This year seems to be the year of technically great movies with messy stories and writing. When you have Roger Deakins as your DP you're in good hands. He made the most out of it. There were only a couple of times where you could see an obvious stabilisation filter which did throw me off, but it's acceptable for a movie like this. Some of the scenes were absolutely amazing. The night scenes were all fabulous looking. The yellow and orange tone of the lights contrast to the blackness of night were astonishing. I also really loved the scene when he ran across the field at the end. It was brilliant, he kept running into people which I liked. I won't mind this winning the cinematography oscar, although The Lighthouse deserves it a bit more in my opinion. Let's get into the story and the writing, because there's quite a few things to talk about. Tommen Baratheon and the guy from A Flock of Seagulls has to get to a line of soldiers before they walk into a trap. So, we follow these guys through that mission. Now, about the writing. Thre are so many conveniences. Everything seems to work out fine even though it would appear otherwise. A character has to jump from a bridge into a river at one point and it so happens that the river floats in the exact direction he has to go. A truck full of soldiers just happen to appear exactly when they're needed to. Every german soldier we face just happens to be the worst shots ever. The main guy is apparently invincible. He walks out of several life ending injuries without even a limp or head trauma or anything. That rat just so happens to walk across the trip wire at the exact moment they're in there instead of any minute before or after. And they so happens to come out of it fully scathed just in time before it collapsed into itself. Stupid decisions are made by the characters. A character dies because of a really stupid decision in which where the outcome is also very clichéd and cheesy. The dialogue is really bad at parts. Everyone talks like it's modern day. I don't think any effort was put into researching how people would talk to each other in 1917. Also, it's really cheesy how people talk to each other. There's a bunch of pointless exposition. A character would state something very obvious that we'd be able to tell with just visuals. They're constantly talking to each other very loudly when they're sneaking around. The script could definitely have used a few more drafts before making its way into production. You should've just focused on it being solely a visual experience. However, it just so happens that the technical aspects are enough to still make this a very good movie worth watching. If it weren't for the fact that it's all done in Birdman-style I don't think this movie would've been talked about as much. Hiring Roger Deakins was the best idea they could've ever had. Comedy, Drama, Mystery 51 A loving mom becomes compelled to reconnect with her creative passions after years of sacrificing herself for her family. Her leap of faith takes her on an epic adventure that jump-starts her life and leads to her triumphant rediscovery. Richard Linklater Cate Blanchett, Billy Crudup, Emma Nelson, Kristen Wiig 9, 104 9. 20M "Where'd You Go, Bernadette. alludes to more than one thing in this story, which is a fun tidbit that goes solely credited to Maria Semple who wrote the book that this was based on. This is not a staple of any kind. It's not one of Richard Linklater's best movies and it's not one of the movies from 2019 that you have to see. It's very average. I liked the movie overall, but let me point something out here: When you read the description of this movie and watch it, you'll realise that it only specifies the last 30-40 minutes of the entire film. It takes a really long time to get started. I didn't hate it at all, but I was sort of watching it passively while a basketball game was going on. It's decent writing, some fun scenes and Cate Blanchett gives a good performance. However, it lacks any substantial filmmaking. It was only about an hour into it where I started getting invested. I mean, I can't really blame the movie for being paced that way because it all builds up and is taking its time with its main character. To remove a scene or two would make it way more rushed. I'm just both curious and fascinated about the description. Even though it sets your expectations in the wrong way, it does actually make a good point about the movie. It points out the fact that nothing leading up to that point is really worth mentioning, which is not the way I'd like my movie to be. Basically the thing holding this movie together is Cate Blanchett's performance. Billy Crudup certainly isn't helping out that much. I thought that he was extremely one note and boring. Their daughter is fine, but I doubt that she'll be remembered for this role. In fact, I don't think people will remember this movie at all in a couple of years - cite Last Flag Flying. I think I liked that movie more because of the character dynamics and that there's more than one good performance. But, I can't say that I remember much of the plot. This moved a bit faster, I'll give it that and I'm shocked at how much I had to say about a movie as "middle of the road" as this one. I don't really mind this movie, but I doubt that I'll watch it again. 174 min Biography, Drama, Romance The Austrian Franz Jägerstätter, a conscientious objector, refuses to fight for the Nazis in World War II. Terrence Malick August Diehl, Valerie Pachner, Maria Simon, Karin Neuhäuser 5, 531 You know exactly what you're getting into. A poetic drama with great cinematography. This one was a bit too long, though. I can only take so much of the same thing over and over again. I also don't like when movies set in foreign countries have English as their spoken dialogue. Why were people speaking English with each other in this movie? Not only that, but they also spoke German in the same scenes. If you're gonna do that then at least be consistent with it. I'll be annoyed, but I'll get over it eventually. But when you're switching back and forth between the two, you distance yourself from reality and from me. The movie looks amazing and the acting is great as to be expected from a Terrence Malick movie, but it's very stretched out. It could've been just 2 hours instead. It's very repetitive. The story is good and moving, it just takes way too far to get there. If you like Terrence Malick movies then you'll like this one. 130 min Documentary, Biography, Sport Constructed from over 500 hours of never-before-seen footage, this documentary centers on the career of celebrated football player Diego Armando Maradona, who played for S. S. C. Napoli in the 1980s. Asif Kapadia Pelé, Diego Armando Maradona, Dalma Maradona, Claudia Villafañe 5, 780 This movie could trim off 20 minutes from its runtime. It's one of those objectively great movies that I just didn't really attach myself to and I think that the runtime is a big part of why. Because I love football and I think that Maradona is an interesting person. Maybe my expectations were too high. I really wanted to see this movie, not only because of Maradona, but because of the director as well. The movie is definitely well made. I really like how Asif Kapadia constructs his documentaries. Everything is archival footage and all the interviews made for the movie is audio only. It's a unique way to tell a story in a genre where its limitations are more apparent than others. The structure and the story is strong enough to keep the movie interesting. It fizzles out a bit towards the end, though. You feel like the movie should be ending soon and check your watch repeatedly. That's what I did, anyway. I'm sure that alot of people didn't. It's just my experience. In short, good movie, drags a bit, lost my attention. 122 min In Gotham City, mentally troubled comedian Arthur Fleck is disregarded and mistreated by society. He then embarks on a downward spiral of revolution and bloody crime. This path brings him face-to-face with his alter-ego: the Joker. Todd Phillips Joaquin Phoenix, Zazie Beetz, Frances Conroy 670, 742 192. 73M Can we please just stop overhyping these movies? Yes, it's a much better interpretation of the Joker than what we got in Suicide Squad. It's not the 10th f'king greatest movie of all time, come back to planet f'king earth, people! Joaquin Phoenix does an amazing job, but let's face it, no one will ever top Heath Ledger. Everyone else is fine. The story and character writing is shamelessly ripping off every Martin Scorsese movie they could find. It wants to be Taxi Driver and King of Comedy so bad. He hangs around shirtless in his appartment acting weird and playing with a gun, just like Travis Bickle. His character looks like Max Cady from Cape Fear. There's a bit of Mean Streets in him too. He's basically every Robert De Niro character ever combined into one - and a clown. The movie is manipulative in how it overlays the score during the hyper emotional scenes so that the audience knows what to feel rather than giving us the opportunity to experience the emotion by ourselves. The movie often sets things up for us so that we already know how a scene will conclude. It dumb things down for us. There's one twist that caught me off guard. I mean, the subplot felt really odd and poorly developed, I just didn't think too much about it. But they ruined the reveal by spelling it out for us just in case we didn't get it. You can see the ending coming from a mile away. SPOILERS* It would be much more satisfying if he shot himself and not De Niro. I mean, this is still a decent movie, but I'm just so fed up with this comic book movie hyperbole. Although, during the climax of the movie some dude in the crowd was holding up a wicker chair for no reason which made me laugh, so I guess I'll recommend it. 116 min Comedy, Fantasy, Music A struggling musician realizes he's the only person on Earth who can remember The Beatles after waking up in an alternate timeline where they never existed. Danny Boyle Himesh Patel, Lily James, Sophia Di Martino, Ellise Chappell 77, 492 73. 29M You can get into the logistics of this fantasy if you want to. There are some things that I find extremely improbable and that doesn't make much sense. However, I was able to suspend my disbeliefs enough to still enjoy the film. Had they went out of their way to expand on this idea in the most outlandish of ways I would've enjoyed it alot more, though. This is by far the cheesiest movie that Danny Boyle has ever directed. There's not a whole lot of his visual style in this movie. I wanted him to go full Danny Boyle on this - it's why I was excited to watch it. Instead it's played safe for most of the time. Also, I'm not a Beatles connoisseur. I like them, I appreciate them, but they're not on my reguar playlists. Thus, the movie isn't luring me on that path either. I guess I was expecting alot more from this movie, it's very mediocre. I liked it just fine, it had some good moments. One of Danny Boyle's least interesting movies, though. With this premise and this director, I'm shocked that this was the outcome. Crime, Drama A gangster on the run sacrifices everything for his family and a woman he meets while on the lam. Yi'nan Diao Ge Hu, Lun-Mei Kwei, Fan Liao, Regina Wan 1, 627 This should've been called "Excessive paranoia. It's so excessive that it becomes absurd. I couldn't really take it seriously, it got to that point. I just wanted the forced tention to be over with. It also doesn't help that the plot is more confusing than Wild Things. There are so many double crosses and triple crosses, I couldn't keep up. I don't think I'm being racist when I say that I didn't know who was who at several points. There's a whole bunch of characters and some of them aren't properly developed, so in certain gun battles for instance, I had no idea what was going on, who was shooting at who and why. There have been several other asian movies with an intricate plot and a sh*tload of characters that I've been able to follow just fine. This movie just did a poor job. It has some very strange presentation and editing decisions. Decisions that made scenes very jarring to watch, but I kind of liked those actually. This movie is weird enough to where I didn't hate it. I can't say I liked it because of them, but it definitely helped the experience. The first act is actually pretty solid. It had me going up until a point. The point being the excessive paranoia. The movie should've been eitehr two things: A serious drama thriller with a less intricate plot or a completely bonkers action comedy. Instead it became a unintentionally bonkers serious drama thriller. Which could be fun in its own right, but the pace is too slow for that to work. Horror, Mystery, Thriller A family's serene beach vacation turns to chaos when their doppelgängers appear and begin to terrorize them. Jordan Peele Lupita Nyong'o, Winston Duke, Elisabeth Moss, Tim Heidecker 182, 014 175. 01M I'm torn on this movie. I really liked it two thirds through. It was creepy and funny at the same time. Some of the jokes were inappropriate, but most of them worked really well and blended nicely with the horror going on. Then, like Get Out before it, it gets kinda messy in the third act. This one much more so. I do not like the fact that things were explained to us in any way. The movie would benefit alot from not telling us anything. Another problem with it is that they only explained some things, which could be better, but in this movie it just feels like they didn't explain that because they had no clue themselves how the f'k something like that would happen. The acting is pretty good. Lupita Nyong'o does a great job and the rest are serviceable, except for Winston Duke who was just flat out bad in my opinion. It didn't have alot of jumpscares which I appreciate, Jordan Peele is restrained in that aspect, but not when it comes to ending a movie. I also don't understand the significance of I Got 5 on it. It's a good song, but I can't say that it has anything to do with the story. Get Out is superior to Us. The first act of this is great, the second act is very good and the third act is not good. Action, Biography, Drama American car designer Carroll Shelby and driver Ken Miles battle corporate interference and the laws of physics to build a revolutionary race car for Ford in order to defeat Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1966. James Mangold Matt Damon, Christian Bale, Jon Bernthal, Caitriona Balfe 133, 645 It was alright. It was really cheesy. It's a by the numbers Oscar-bait biopic. It looks good, I'll give it that, but everything else is nothing I would consider better than alright. The acting is alright, nobody does a bad job, but I doubt that anyone will be remember for their performances in this movie. The dialgoue is so f'king cheesy. Everything is said with too much weight to it. All the antagonists are annoyingly cartoony. I couldn't take them seriously. Every time they showed up I rolled my eyes. I kind of just want this movie to leave. I barely want to write a review of it. Like I said, it looks good and I'm sure that it re-creates alot of the stuff well. But like, we've gotten another re-creation of the late 60's already this year that is far superior to this film, so I can't exactly be too excited about that either. I kind of hate that it got a best picture nomination even though the only other ones it got were the "techies. However, I had already predicted that it would get one, so I'm not surprised. It's not a bad movie, in fact, on a spectrum, it's technically a good movie, but I'm going to distance myself from it as much as possible. It's so godd*mn bland. 65 After being attacked on the street, a young man enlists at a local dojo, led by a charismatic and mysterious sensei, in an effort to learn how to defend himself from future threats. Riley Stearns Alessandro Nivola, Imogen Poots, Steve Terada 17, 857 I never believed anything in this movie. This movie asks so much from you in suspending your disbeliefs and I just couldn't do it. None of this sh*t would logically happen. Maybe the first 10 minutes or so, but as soon as the karate school is introduced, the grounding in realism vanishes. There is no way that this would've been going on for so long. Given the talent of the students, I'd say that they've been there for several years - that's just a huge "no. There's a scene where several adults with their children are watching something happen and they do and say absolutely nothing. Something extreme happens towards the end that should send the climax of the film to a completely different place and yet it doesn't. It's not even mentioned again. The twist is not a twist because I called it 25 minutes into the film. It's the most obvious thing in the world and the movie acts as if it's a huge ball drop with the music sting and the zoom in and everything. It's also obvious as to how the climax will be. My next issue is a spoiler so skip to the next paragraph if you haven't seen the movie. How f'king far away from the undercover cop were the backup parked? It took them like a minute before they were in earshot. Seriously, what's the f'king point of having backup if they're not gonna be able to help the undercover cop in an emergency? No one should've been able to escape that ordeal. What can I tell you? This movie is not that great. It has good cinematography, acting and some cool reincorporations here and there, but that's pretty much it. 4/10 69 Dick died last night, and Zeke and Earl don't want anybody finding out how. That's too bad though, cause news travels fast in small-town Alabama. Daniel Scheinert Michael Abbott Jr., Virginia Newcomb, Andre Hyland, Sarah Baker 2, 400 This was fine? It was pretty average overall. This is a spoiler review. Don't read if you haven't seen the movie and want to. It was sold to me as a hilarious comedy, but I don't think I broke out more than a chuckle once or twice. It was more sad than anything. The acting is pretty good to servicable. The directing is pretty good. I liked the story in general. I would liked to have seen some things handled in a different way. The fact that the main character and his buddy are stupid made me not really sympathize with them. When he gets his whole life thrown into his face I just didn't care that much. For me, to work, he should've just been a closeted pervert. The reveal halfway through was poorly executed. Here's how it should have gone: Police walks up to the coroner. They ask a question and he gets ready to spill the beans. Cut to the main character bluntly telling his wife the truth, hard cut back to reaction shot of the cops. Instead they did this awkward back and forth between these scenes, which completely ruined the surprise. I don't know. It didn't click with me. It wasn't bad by any means, I just didn't like it that much. I never saw Swiss Army Man because it didn't look like something I'd like either. I will most certainly never watch it now after seeing The Death of Dick Long. 110 min Inspired by the viral New York Magazine article, Hustlers follows a crew of savvy former strip club employees who band together to turn the tables on their Wall Street clients. Lorene Scafaria Constance Wu, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Stiles, Mette Towley 51, 675 80. 55M Okay, I fully admit that I am a white male in an average situation financially. However, I know when a movie is trying to push an agenda onto me. There are alot of grey areas in life, but it's extremely obvious that this movie is trying to beat you over the head with a point and I gotta say, I don't agree with said point. You can't justify crime by saying that everyone's a criminal - especially the guys at Wall Street. Yes, Wall Street is a crooked f'king place, that doesn't give them the right to rip people off as well. Granted, most of the people they were ripping off could afford it, but clearly they would've done it to people who couldn't as well with no remorse. Don't tell me that they wouldn't because the main character felt bad about it and that it was only initiated by Jennifer Lopez. The movie ended on Jennifer Lopez further pushing this agenda directly to the audience - so clearly, the movie is using her words as gospel. It also tries to justify their actions by citing their hard upbringing. I know this is easier said than done, but I've heard from actual people with a hard upbringing that it's not indeed justifiable. It's a choice you make as a human being. You fight to stay alive, sometimes it's not a cake walk. But the further you get into the film, these girls were not just doing it to stay alive anymore. I can't say that I liked the main characters. Both Constance Wu and Jennifer Lopez were pretty condescending towards people who didn't deserve it. Jennifer Lopez was awful. Constance Wu is more likable, sure, but she had bad moments and I don't care much for her as an actor. I liked Keke Palmer and Lili Reinhart, I found them much more sympathetic and much less preachy. They all did a good job acting, though. The filmmaking isn't perfect either. It looks good and has some cool shots here and there. The sequencing is so painted by numbers, very predictable and once again, it keeps shoving this message down your throat. So, I can't say that the directing is great. The sound mixing is pretty bad at parts. There's several moments when classical music is played and during these segments I struggled to hear what the characters were saying. The movie's tone felt sort of bipolar because while you have these classical music segments, you have even more scenes when they play a pop song from the timeframe we're in at the time. I'd say, pick one. It doesn't mesh at all when you combine the two. Also, that was pretty much the only effort put in to the authenticity of the timeframe. You could say that all of this movie took place during 2007 or 2017 and I wouldn't have noticed. Just playing an Usher song is not enough to convince me that we're in 2007. This movie is quite obnoxious in all honesty. It's far from incompetent, but all these things put together severely lowers the score for me. It wasn't boring in the slightest, though., which I have to give it props for. Cardi B is in it, she was alright. Unrated 111 min Horror, Sci-Fi 70 A secluded farm is struck by a strange meteorite which has apocalyptic consequences for the family living there and possibly the world. Richard Stanley Nicolas Cage, Joely Richardson, Madeleine Arthur, Elliot Knight 5, 339 Spoiler review. This movie really wanted to be something cool and different. It failed miserably. All it did was steal from other better movies. It tries to be Mandy, Annihilation and The Thing. I think Richard Stanley saw these things, he saw that people were craving for more crazy Nicolas Cage movies and wanted to take advantage of it, while not having the talent to bring that to light. Something must've gone horribly wrong during this production because the worst thing about the movie might be Nicolas Cage. It's a case of either him not being given any directions or too many. When he was going crazy I never believed it like I did in Mandy or Mom and Dad. He does this strange accent which I believe is a really poor Marlon Brando impression, but he only does it like three times and it's only during these strange points when his character is supposed to be affected by the thing. However, it's not every time. At the end he's acting like a child for one scene and in the next scene he shows up with a shotgun like the previous scene never happened. I didn't like any of the characters. Everyone did a whole bunch of stupid sh*t, had poor performances or were just generally unlikable. That stupid moment with the older son going down the well was just a poor excuse to kill him off. The rules as to what the thing could do were all over the place. It took over the alpackas and used the dog as bait, but for some reason left the horse alone. Same thing goes for the people. How come it didn't succeed to seduce the water guy? I get the daughter because she decided to put a protecting spell on herself, but he didn't do that, why didn't he go crazy? The only positives are some of the technical parts. The general visual effects were pretty good, except for the CGI-monsters. They weren't terrible, but it did take me out of the movie. I liked the score. The movie would benefit from being 30 minutes shorter because it takes a long time to get to the point. The best part of the movie was towards the end during a very dramatic scene. I mean, it was supposed to be dramatic, but everyone in the theatre, myself included, seemed to lose it simultaniously and were trying their hardest to hold back laughter. I would not recommend this movie at all, however. There was only one unintentionally funny scene and the rest was either boring or embarrassing. 3/10 61 Loyalties are tested when five friends and former special forces operatives reunite to take down a South American drug lord, unleashing a chain of unintended consequences. J. Chandor Ben Affleck, Oscar Isaac, Charlie Hunnam, Garrett Hedlund 90, 582 A generally well made movie on all technical levels. It was easy to look at - definitely well shot, no specific shots stands out in my mind, but that doesn't make it bad. I'm no army expert, but I've known a couple for a long time and so, from my experience watching these kind of movies with them, the proceedural seemed legit - again, generally. Here's what I think the movie lacks: characters. I found all 5 characters rather boring. In the beginning they were just dudebro's and straight-men. As the plot progresses they have pointless fights and arguments. Some of them had some character traits, but not enough to be fully fleshed out characters. Charlie Hunnam and Garrett Hedlund were pretty much indistinguishable. Secondly: the pace. This movie could easily have been 25 minutes shorter. As I mentioned all the pointless fights and arguments really served no purpose. All the stops when they sit down to collect themselves doesn't need to be there. You spend a decent amount of time looking at your watch while the movie takes its sweet time showing us things that we didn't need to know. The ending was handled in a poor way. It was definitely set up but the execution of it just makes me ask why? Why did you wait to reveal that information and why did you only tell one person? Why did you wait until afterwards? It looked as if there were two sets of. on the thing, does that mean that you wrote it down while airbourne? It makes no sense to me. I can see people really liking this movie, but I doubt that I'll ever watch it again. I'd rather go back and revisit A Most Violent Year instead. 89 min Documentary, Drama The last female bee-hunter in Europe must save the bees and return the natural balance in Honeyland, when a family of nomadic beekeepers invade her land and threaten her livelihood. Tamara Kotevska, Ljubomir Stefanov Hatidze Muratova, Nazife Muratova, Hussein Sam, Ljutvie Sam 6, 429 0. 50M This really should've been a short. There's so much f'king padding in this movie. The exact same point could be made in 30 minutes or less. We didn't need to sit for 85 minutes watching this movie and not get the same amount out of it if it were 30 minutes instead. I skipped ahead 10 minutes in the middle and nothing had changed, it only forwarded the plot more quickly. It looks alright, it's not the beautiful cinmatography I was promised, it was good. It was fine. There's a sort of twist, I guess, but it was honestly kind of inevitable once it was presented. You're obviously not supposed to like the family, but they didn't have to show so much of them. Barely any of it was interesting. There were also lengthy scenes of them abusing animals. I didn't like that. Sure, it set up that they're not as careful around nature as the protagonist, but seriously, you could already tell by how their entrance was set up. Why did go on for so long? I got the impression that the filmmakers were fine with that sort of behavior. I really don't understand the praise for this movie. It's so f'king boring. It'll probably be Oscar nominated for best documentary, but it better not win. There are much more well made documentaries out there this year. 97 min Adventure, Comedy, Drama Zak runs away from his care home to make his dream of becoming a wrestler come true. Tyler Nilson, Michael Schwartz Zack Gottsagen, Ann Owens, Dakota Johnson, Bruce Dern 32, 433 13. 12M Not for me. This is going to be a spoiler review. Only read this if you've already seen the movie or if you don't care. The movie's fine. It's a less fun and creative version of movies like Hunt for the Wilderpeople. There aren't really any stakes. There's an illusion of stakes, but ultimately, the outcome is as if nothing matters. The implications are that they just escaped, but it's poorly executed. John Hawkes and Yelawolf catch up to them and beat up Shia LaBeouf, yes, but didn't he owe them like 12 000? Did they just drop that after beating him up? They managed to follow them through bumf'k South Carolina or wherever they were. There's nothing indicating that they wouldn't be able to find them again. I know, the movie isn't about that, it's about Zak wanting to have a family, but why even throw in that sub-plot in the first place if you aren't going to properly tie it up? The plot device of Dakota Johnson going to look for him is extremely poorly set up. It would be better if she just went rouge. The scene when her boss tells her to find him didn't make any sense. It's very predictable. The moment when he pops a VHS-tape to watch a wrestler tells you that A: he's going to meet this guy and B: the wrestling school is going to be shut down because it's on a VHS-tape. You know from the get-go that Zak and Shia LaBeouf are going to get together and bond and inspire each other. If you can get sucked into a movie like this, more power to you. I can't. If I'm going to watch a movie that I can predict from start to finish then I have to love its tone. I didn't do that with this movie. 120 min Drama, Mystery, Romance A young film student in the early '80s becomes romantically involved with a complicated and untrustworthy man. Joanna Hogg Neil Young, Tosin Cole, Jack McMullen, Frankie Wilson 5, 888 1. 04M I just did not care at all. The movie is so long and not justified to be so. It keeps repeating the same sh*t over and over again. The main character is somewhat likeable, but everyone else are just so f'king boring. The main guy is the most uncharismatic wetsack of an actor that I've seen in a long time. I get that you're not supposed to like him, but it was like watching Xanax personified. It was the flattest performance since Domnhall Gleeson in The Little Stranger. I didn't buy for a second that the main character would fall hopelessly in love with this guy. He's pompous, selfish and treats her like sh*t from the beginning, so how did this happen in the first place? When I added this to my watchlist I was under the impression that Tilda Swinton and Richard Ayoade would be the main characters. Not only are they barely in the film, but they're extremely under-used. Tilda Swinton is one of the most skilled and unique actors working today and Richard Ayoad is my favorite comedian of all time. Yet, somehow they managed to make both of them boring. It tries to be this complex love story, a la Phantom Thread, but it fails because the love between the characters didn't feel organic in the slightest. This is the kind of indie movie that turns normal people away from indie movies. It's not as bad as Serenity, but I'd watch that movie again over this one because at least that one was funny. Did I miss something? I doubt it, but let me know if I did. 52 A chronicle of the crimes of Ted Bundy from the perspective of Liz, his longtime girlfriend, who refused to believe the truth about him for years. Joe Berlinger Lily Collins, Zac Efron, Angela Sarafyan, Sydney Vollmer 63, 743 Just an awul way to tell this story. I don't give a flying f'k about Ted Bundy's relationship with his wife if there's nothing interesting going on there and if this movie's portrayal of it is accurate then there isn't. Yet, they spend so much time emphasising on this instead of going into detail of his crimes - the f'king reason I'm watching this movie. When I see that a film about Ted Bundy is in production I expect Zodiac, I expect The Clovehitch Killer. I do not expect a f'king Nicholas Sparks movie. We never see him doing anything incriminating except for punching a police officer and jumping out of a court house window, until the end when we see like a 10 second flashback. Instead we get boring court room scenes, pointless romance and drama and a whole bunch of repetition of information. That moment when she tells him that she gave his name to the police would have had much more weight to it if we didn't already know that from a previous scene. It would also both make sense and be more satisfying if he lost it and through a temper tantrum as a result of her telling him. This movie would've made so much more sense if it was a completely fictional character who was actually innocent. The movie treats him as if he is. If this actually happened and if he was in denial, then the movie doesn't demonstrate it at all. If he was lying just to get out of trouble, then he should be much more sinister and uncomfortable. The way this was written will most likely give young people a massive misconception of what kind of person he actually was. Ted Bundy was a monster and should be protrayed as such. This could've been a fantastic character study. I would love this story retold as a Zodiac type of movie. Would I have gone easier on this movie if I hadn't watched the first season of Mindhunter just a couple of days prior? Maybe, I can't confirm nor deny this, but the fact is that there is your gold standard. You have excellent stuff already existing tackling similar things at your disposal. Take some inspiration from here and there, factor in the "extremely wicked, shockingly evil and vile" stuff and boom - you've got yourself an interesting character study. And can we talk about that title as well? It's so stupid and clunky. The fact that they say it in the film also maks me want to blow my brains out. I would not recommend this movie at all. 142 min Action, Adventure, Fantasy The surviving members of the resistance face the First Order once again, and the legendary conflict between the Jedi and the Sith reaches its peak bringing the Skywalker saga to its end. J. Abrams Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, Daisy Ridley 253, 696 I, don't know. I got alot of personal enjoyment out of this movie for various reasons. Alot of them being inside stuff with my friends. I really liked it. But, as a movie, as an unbiased reviewer, I really don't know as of this moment. I need to watch it again to determine this. I'll put this review on stand-by until I do. Comedy, Crime, Romance A young boxer and a call girl get caught up in a drug-smuggling scheme over the course of one night in Tokyo. Takashi Miike Becky, Bengal, Masayuki Deai, Mami Fujioka 1, 343 136 min Set in 1825, Clare, a young Irish convict woman, chases a British officer through the rugged Tasmanian wilderness, bent on revenge for a terrible act of violence he committed against her family. On the way she enlists the services of an Aboriginal tracker named Billy, who is also marked by trauma from his own violence-filled past. Jennifer Kent Aisling Franciosi, Sam Claflin, Michael Sheasby, Claire Jones 11, 278 0. 39M Idealistic Senate staffer Daniel J. Jones, tasked by his boss to lead an investigation into the CIA's post 9/11 Detention and Interrogation Program, uncovers shocking secrets. Scott Z. Burns Annette Bening, Jon Hamm, Ted Levine 18, 955 49 min Elliot, a brilliant but highly unstable young cyber-security engineer and vigilante hacker, becomes a key figure in a complex game of global dominance when he and his shadowy allies try to take down the corrupt corporation he works for. Rami Malek, Christian Slater, Carly Chaikin, Martin Wallström 305, 695 Season 4 57 min Action, Adventure, Drama Nine noble families fight for control over the mythical lands of Westeros, while an ancient enemy returns after being dormant for thousands of years. Emilia Clarke, Peter Dinklage, Kit Harington, Lena Headey 1, 638, 937 Season 8 There's an interesting quote from season 1. Jon Snow and Jeor Mormont are talking about the death of his father and all that. It goes something along the lines of "Your brother's war means nothing compared to what lies ahead in the north. When the dead comes do you think it matters who sits on the iron throne? How ironic that the show mid-season decided to kill off the Night King and instead focus on who will sit on the iron throne. What is there to say that hasn't already been said by everyone else? Season 7 was sh*t, but it was still much better than this season. It's so sad to see such a brilliant show fall to this level. Big shout out to the crew who's achieved something that no other TV-show crew ever has before. Episode 5 is flawless on a technical level. Too bad that the writers inherently lost their minds, because nothing in the episode makes any sense. The show stopped being about world building and character development and ended up just being about spectacle - sacrificing character logic among other things in the process. These two last seasons needed to be at least 3 full 10 episode-seasons for the plot points to make sense. Nothing is properly developed, everything is forced, there are alot of loose threads. Episode 2 and 6 were fine, mainy because they were about the characters interracting with each other. Episode 6 was still really stupid, but it was nice to see where everyone ended up. Episode 2 was all about everyone waiting for the battle to happen, which is something I've always been fascinated by. This season gets a 3/10 because the writing is so fundamentally broken. The show's watch has now ended and it's time for its evaluation. The first 4 seasons are almost perfect. There are just a couple of things that could be better. Season 5 is a drop in quality, but the fling is still there. The Hardhome sequence is amazing. I do like the Sons of the Harpy plot, except for the death of Barristan Selmy which I don't buy - there needed to be alot more people there for it to work. The final scene would probably have been the most emotional scene for me if I hadn't been spoiled for it before. Season 6 is more of the same as season 5. The last two episodes are fantastic, even if they have a couple of stupid moments, but not too many. After that we get to the dumpster fire of the last two seasons. My favorite storyline is the Jon Snow/The Night's Watch stuff. I also love the King's Landing stuff up until season 5 starts, especially when Tyrion serves as hand of the king. Some of my favorite characters are Jaime Lannister, Tyrion Lannister, Jon Snow, Ygritte and Oberyn Martell. My favorite episode is The Watchers on the Wall and my favorite season is season 4. I've almost teared up a total of three times during this show and they're all deaths: SPOILER, the death of Maester Luwin, the death of Ygritte and the thought-to-be death of The Hound. Season 1-4 gets a 9/10. Season 5-8 gets a 5/10 - making the show as a whole a 7/10. 55 min Crime, Drama, Mystery Seasonal anthology series in which police investigations unearth the personal and professional secrets of those involved, both within and outside the law. Colin Farrell, Rachel McAdams, Taylor Kitsch 465, 537 Season 3 It's essentially a soft reboot of season 1. They welcome you back with open arms after the colossal failure that was season 2 to let you know it's okay. It's like if Steph Curry missed an open game-winning 3-pointer and then Draymond Green tips it in to tie the game. It's obviously not better than a game-winning 3, but the job is done and there's hope for us to win the game in overtime. The tone is borrowed from season 1 and that's not a detriment. True Detective works better when it's eerie and disgusting and deals with these kind of crimes. Had they spent 3 years working on season 2 instead of sh*tting it out in a year, maybe it would've been brilliant, but they didn't. I liked this story. I liked the characters, most of them anyway. The acting was great, mostly - Mamie Gummer was not, unfortunately. Mahershala Ali is outstanding. He sells every timeline. He's an excellent old man. Stephen Dorff and Carmen Ejogo are pretty great too and so is Scoot McNairy. It is a bit cheesy at times and it spills things out for us alot more than season 1. It ends in a strange way as well. I'm not going to spoil anything, but the final scene's outcome was something that we already knew. I appreciate that they tried to do something different, but it just left me with without any sort of closure. These things don't take away much from the enjoyment, however. It's not as great as season 1 (few things are) but it's a huge improvement from season 2. The best scene is when old Wayne and old Roland talks on the porch. 60 min Set in the late 1970s, two FBI agents are tasked with interviewing serial killers to solve open cases. Jonathan Groff, Holt McCallany, Anna Torv, Hannah Gross 176, 241 Season 2 Mindhunter is a fantastically crafted and thought provoking show. It's very meticulous in everything it does, mainly because the tone is set by David Fincher. However, the dialogue is almost out of this world, especially during the interviews where the show shines the most. It's constantly moving in directions that keeps you engaged, even though it sounds kind of dry on paper. But enough about season 1. This season was different. Everything that's great about the show is great in season 2 as well. The problem is the pacing. When we start the show we're continuing from season 1 and do so for the entire first half of the season. The second half feels like a really long standalone film. All the things that make the show great and unique takes a backseat to the main story to the point where things that have been set up doesn't really pay off. We completely lose track of Wendy and Gregg. The plot clearly didn't care for Wendy's romance, yet they kept shoehorn scenes into the episodes. It just feels off. It feels like Anna Torv was under contract for 9 episodes and they needed to find ways for her to appear in every episode. What do we do? Oh, lets just give her a romance that goes nowhere and then they break up, spoilers I guess, but who cares? It's completely pointless, Wendy doesn't grown anything as a character from this. The climax of season 2 is almost non-existant when you compare it to the climax of season 1. You barely get any closure, you're not on the edge of your seat, it just ends. The standalone movie that has been going on for the past 4 hours just ends. But still, the first half of the season is on the same page as season 1. The Manson interview was phenomenal. It came at the perfect time in the story. Manson's theological and psychological rambling fits with his character and it fuels the fire previously set up with Bill flawlessly. The lead up to Manson also gives us another scene with Ed Kemper who's one of the most compelling and frightening character I've encountered on screen for a long time. It's his only scene in the season, though, which is a shame. Although if he kept being in the show, he would've just been a Hannibal Lecter clone. I'm actually really disappointed with how this turned out. Crazy as it may be, because it's still a great show, but that first season is on the level of True Detective when it comes to first seasons. 8/10. Yes. 25 min Animation, Comedy, Drama BoJack Horseman was the star of the hit television show "Horsin' Around" in the '80s and '90s, now he's washed up, living in Hollywood, complaining about everything, and wearing colorful sweaters. Will Arnett, Amy Sedaris, Alison Brie, Aaron Paul 86, 491 Season 6: Part 1 Bojack is going to jail. 30 min While on quests to pursue love, sex, and fame with his friends in Los Angeles, Ulysses' premonitory dreams make him question the possible presence of a dark and monstrous conspiracy. Avan Jogia, Kelli Berglund, Beau Mirchoff, Roxane Mesquida 2, 390 As a huge fan of Gregg Araki, I totally get this show. It's everything that I expected and wanted out of it. I also fully understand the fact that alot of people will hate it, because that's the case with almost everything Araki has done before. His style is so out there and so in your face that if you don't see anything in it from the get go, it might annoy you to the point of extreme frustration. Which is quite a shame, because I would love a season 2 of this sh*t and I'm sure that every Gregg Araki fan would agree. My favourite Araki film (3rd favourite movie of all time) is a movie called Nowhere. Now Apocalypse has so many echoes of Nowhere. The general themes stay the same through most his films, but it's the little details. A main character is very upset about the fact that his girlfriend wants to sleep with other people, this very girlfriend has sex with two twin brothers, a very masculine guy enjoys being spanked by his girlfriend, a main character records himself philosophising in his bed, a main character has a slight sexual encounter with a man who is later abducted by space aliens, the alien costume is the very same one as the one in Nowhere. I can go on forever. Seeing the same things taking place in the work created by the same guy, but presenting it in two completely different eras of film is one of the most fascinating things to me, considering I already had such a huge fondness for the original thing. Like, I love this, but I can't see myself giving this a fair rating. It's f'king far from perfect and I don't think alot of people will like it, which I completely understand and I will not make any objections towards these people. Just my sheer love for this is a solid 10/10, but I can't give it that. My ratings are objective. I encourage everyone to give it a chance and you'll make up your mind yourselves. The show tracks the Wu Tang Clan's formation, a vision of Bobby Diggs, who strives to unite a dozen young, black men that are torn between music and crime but eventually rise to become the unlikeliest of American success stories. Tamiz U. Rezvi, Erika Alexander, T. Atoms, Joey Bada 2, 375 This show is far from perfect. I think an objective rating for this would be like a 6/10 or something. It does have some style to it, but it varies from episode to episode - depending on the director, I guess. There's one episode that was fantastic. It's divided into five or six scenes that are all executed in one take each. It was not something I was expecting at all. There all well made and the story in the episode moves in a great way. Generally the acting is very on and off. Ashton Sanders was fantastic in Moonlight, but in this I feel like he was told to put more emphasis on imitating The RZA than on conveying emotions. So sometimes he talks in a very distracting way. Siddiq Saunderson who plays Ghostface Killah is pretty decent throughout, but he has moments when he's really great on doing just that what Sanders didn't. Julian Elijah Martinez was pretty bad in my opinion. Dave East does a killer Method Man impersonation, Shameik Moore does a killer Raekwon impersonation - although his rapping isn't that great. Same goes for TJ Atoms. He embodies Ol' Dirty Bastard, but his interpretation of the verse in 7th Chamber was awful. All of the bit characters were pretty great though. Bokeem Woodbine, Jamie Hector, Joey Bada etc. The ending was very rushed, though. It felt like the ending of The Kingdom where we've spent alot of time on some inconsequential things and then suddenly a sh*tton of things happened in the last 5 minutes - but ti didn't exactly connect all the dots together. Like, we didn't exactly get a resolution on the whole Ghost and Rae storyline. They're at each others throats for the entire show and in real life during the Wu-Tang hay-day they were like inseparable. I wanted to see that but we didn't, unfortunately. All of this considered, I would like to make a confession: I think this is my show of the year. I know I just gave it a ton of criticism, but I kind of f'king loved watching this. No show this year has had me glued to the seat more than Wu-Tang: An American Saga. Watching an episode of this has been a highlight of the week for the past 10 weeks. As of to this moment I have even prioritized this show over Mr. Robot, which is my 2nd favorite show of all time. It has re-ignited my love for the Wu-Tang Clan. I have been blasting them non-stop since I started watching this - something I haven't really done since I was 14. Doing this has made me reconsider my favorite songs of theirs and has made me appreciate some of their songs much more than I did at 14, when my favorites were Nothin ta f' wit, Da Mystery of Chessboxin and Triumph. Now I'm all about Bring Da Ruckus, 7th Chamber and Wu-Gambinos. And there's still really good things about this show. The episode that I previously mentioned for instance. There are some twists that I did not see coming. I was 100% sure that one of the characters was supposed to be a member of the group, but then he died just like that. So, if you love Wu-Tang as much as I do and you haven't seen this, you're doing yourselves a disservice. 6/10.

Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15, 000 new posts/day with fewer ads. 02-03-2016, 06:39 AM 31, 339 posts, read 48, 685, 881 times Reputation: 17053 Love The Terminal- one of Hanks better roles Saw Jane Got Her Gun- Poor Natalie Portman- her career is just going downhill on skis... Not great for Edgerton or McGregor but men actors always rise from ashes easier than women- more roles, opportunity... At least McGregor is totally opposite his usual fare... 02-03-2016, 10:45 PM Location: Buckeye, AZ 28, 458 posts, read 16, 548, 595 times Reputation: 10209 The Walk (2015) Robert Zemeckis 02-03-2016, 10:59 PM 4, 456 posts, read 3, 808, 162 times Reputation: 3111 Saw 'The Martian. I thought Ridley was back to form. Would love it if he could get away from the 'blockbusters' for a change, take a rest and maybe go do a film sayin the vein of 'The Duellists. A beautifully crafted film from start to finish. 02-04-2016, 06:56 AM Location: Henderson, NV, U. S. A. 10, 602 posts, read 6, 579, 480 times Reputation: 18439 Quote: Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah The Terminal I watch that almost every year. 02-04-2016, 08:28 AM Location: Austin, TX 2, 722 posts, read 4, 872, 544 times Reputation: 2216 Cartel Land. This was a really good documentary about the Cartels. It also underscores how easily power corrupts even those with the very best of intentions. 02-04-2016, 03:28 PM Anomalisa (2015) Charlie Kaufman ★★★★★ 02-04-2016, 06:30 PM 5, 783 posts, read 3, 136, 651 times Reputation: 26065 02-04-2016, 10:43 PM Location: Texas Hill Country 10, 868 posts, read 5, 938, 672 times Reputation: 9012 En esta cama nadie duerme En esta cama nadie duerme (1971) Nobody Sleeps in this Bed) A comedy about the hotel that everyone has their johns take them to. 02-05-2016, 12:14 AM Originally Posted by GiGi603 Sorry to hear that, it was really a damn good movie IMO. Loved the kitchen drama to it. Here's my latest viewings. Jem & the Holograms (2015) John M. Chu. ★★ Shaun the Sheep (2015) Mark Burton & Richard Starzak. ★★. 5 02-05-2016, 09:01 AM Location: D. C. 2, 903 posts, read 1, 903, 610 times Reputation: 3965 2016 Oscar-nominated Short Films I thought they were all really good, but I'd give the Oscar to Shok. Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over 68, 000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned. Detailed information about all U. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site. All times are GMT -6.

 

Bazen daima asla watch movie 2017.
Bazen Daima Asla Watch movie page imdb.
If your word crosses triple work score in Scrabble, you get three times the points you would get for that word.